On the Coexistence of Democracy and Monarchy: A Constitutional Study and the Constitutional Strains in Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241087Keywords:
Democracy, Constitutions, The King Can Do No Wrong, Coup d’état, JudiciaryAbstract
According to democracy rankings, half of the 20 highest-ranked democracies are monarchies, while 50 of 59 authoritarian regimes are republics. This suggests that a constitutional monarchy – a system that combines democratic governance with a monarch who holds no executive power – can sustain a high level of democracy. In such systems, the prime minister and cabinet govern, while the monarch remains immune from prosecution, with accountability resting on those who act in the monarch’s name.
Thailand, which has experienced 13 coups and adopted 20 constitutions, illustrates how instability arises when coup leaders seek royal consent and the judiciary legitimizes their actions. The image of royal neutrality was weakened after the coups of 2006 and 2014, particularly under the new monarch, largely because the coup makers repeatedly invoked royal authority to justify their actions. For democracy to succeed in Thailand, strict adherence to the principle of “The King Can Do No Wrong” by all institutions is essential. The judiciary must cease legitimizing coups, the Constitutional Court must uphold the rule of law to safeguard both the monarchy and democracy, and the 2017 Constitution – with its undemocratic mechanisms, such as the Senate and the excessive power of the Constitutional Court – must be rewritten.
References
Ahmed, S. (2023). A royal dilemma: Navigating the constitutional monarchist-republican divide in Canada. ResPublica, 6. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/respublica/article/view/41604
Anckar, C. (2020). Constitutional monarchies and semi-constitutional monarchies: A global historical study, 1800-2017. Contemporary Politics, 27(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1824360
Annaka, S., & Kato, G. (2022). Can a constitutional monarch influence democratic preferences?Japanese emperor and the regulation of public expression. Social Science Quarterly, 103(3), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13152
Andeweg, R. (2020). Constitutional functions in the Netherlands. In R. Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy: European monarchies compared (pp. 68-74). Hart Publishing.
Baker, C., & Pasuk, P. (2022). A history of Thailand (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Bishop, S. (2020). Challenging the judicial coup myth: Thai constitutional courts and political crises. In P. Chachavalpongpun (Ed.), Coup, king, crisis: A critical interregnum in Thailand (pp. 199-224). Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.
Bromo, F. (2023). Something old, something new? Votes of confidence, parliamentary dissolution,
election timing, and judicial review under the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 43(2), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2023.2213530
Bulmer, E. (2017). Constitutional monarchs in parliamentary democracies (Primer No. 7). International IDEA.
Bumrungsuk, S. (2019). Thailand’s zigzag road to democracy: Continuity and change in military intervention. In M. Montesano, T. Chong, & M. Heng (Eds.), After the coup: The National Council for Peace and Order era and the future of Thailand (pp. 170-193). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Chaiching, N. (2010). The monarchy and the royalist movement in modern Thai politics, 1932-1957. In S. Ivarsson & L. Isager (Eds.), Saying the unsayable: Monarchy and democracy in Thailand (pp. 147-178). NIAS Press.
Cox, N., & Miller, R. (2010). Monarchy or republic? In R. Miller (Ed.), New Zealand government and politics (pp. 130-144). Oxford University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
Dicey, A. V. (2013). Lectures introductory to the study of the law of the constitution: The Oxford edition of Dicey (J. W. F. Allison, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fortin, M.-F. (2022). Rule of law, parliamentary sovereignty and executive accountability in English legal thinking: The recent revival of “The King Can Do No Wrong.” Journal of Constitutional History. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4121673
Fortin, M.-F. (2024). The King can do no wrong. Oxford University Press. Ganjanakhundee, S. (2019). Anand Panyarachun and royal intervention in Thai politics. ISEAS Perspective. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/media/commentaries/anand-panyarachun-and royal-intervention-in-thai-politics-by-supalak-ganjanakhundee/
Ginsburg, T., Rodriguez, D., & Weingast, B. (2023). The functions of constitutional monarchy: Why kings and queens survive in a world of republics (Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper No. 831). University of Chicago Law School. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4454620
The Guardian. (2024, February 17). Former Thai PM Thaksin Shinawatra released on parole from police hospital. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/17/former-thai-pm-thaksinshinawatra-aboutto-be-released-on-parole
Harding, A., & Leyland, P. (2010). The constitutional system of Thailand: A contextual analysis. Hart Publishing.
Hazell, R. (2020a). Constitutional functions of the monarchy in the UK. In R.
Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 21-26). Hart Publishing.
Hazell, R. (2020b). Monarchy in the constitutional texts. In R.
Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 9-15). Hart Publishing.
Hazell, R. (2020c). Constitutional functions of the monarchy: Introduction. In R.
Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 19-21). Hart Publishing.
Hazell, R. (2020d). Constitutional functions of the monarchy: Conclusion. In R.
Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 60-61). Hart Publishing.
Hazell, R., & Morris, B. (Eds.). (2020). The role of monarchies in modern democracy: European monarchies compared. Hart Publishing. Head, J. (2024, August 7). Thai court dissolves reformist party that won election. BBC. https:// www.bbc.com/news/articles/crkmdd4vevxo
Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
Jatusripitak, N., & Lohatepanont, M. (2025). After the grand compromise: Voter profiles in Thai politics. ISEAS Perspective, 25. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ISEAS_Perspective_2025_25-.pdf
Kasetsiri, C. (2020). King Bhumibol Adulyadej and the neo-monarchy of Thailand. In P. Chachavalpongpun (Ed.), Coup, king, crisis (pp. 97-115). Yale University Press.
Kenny, E. (2024, May 8). Explainer: How Thailand’s Senate elections work. International IDEA. https://www.idea.int/blog/explainer-how-thailands-senate-elections-work
Krittian, H. (2011). Post-coup royalist groups: Re-inventing military and ideological power. In S. Ivarsson & L. Isager (Eds.), Saying the unsayable (pp. 203-220). NIAS Press.
Krunke, H. (2020). The monarch’s constitutional functions in Denmark. In R. Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 27-32). Hart Publishing.
Lincoln, A. (1863). Gettysburg address.
Loughlin, M. (2022). Against constitutionalism. Harvard University Press.
McCargo, D., Alexander, S. T., & Desatova, P. (2017). Ordering palace: Thailand’s 2016 constitutional referendum. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(1), 65-95.
McLean, I., & Peterson, S. (2021). Of crises, constitutionalism and irresponsible advisers. The Political Quarterly, 92(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12985
Mérieau, E. (2022). Constitutional bricolage: Thailand’s sacred monarchy vs. the rule of law. Hart Publishing.
Morris, S. (2021). Imagining an affirmational republic. UNSW Law Journal, 44(3), 1202. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2021/42.html
Nanuam, W. (2020, June 15). Prayut, Prawit warn “movement” against palace. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1935192/prayut-prawit-warnmovement-against-palace
Olechno, A. (n.d.). The constitutional aspects of countersignature in Central and Eastern European countries. https://dukonference.lv/files/proceedings_of_conf/53konf/tiesibas/Olechno.pdf
Online Reporters. (2025, September 3). Can a caretaker PM dissolve the House of Reps? The two sides. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/special-reports/3098017/can-a-caretaker-pm-dissolve-the-house-of-reps-the-two-sides
Online Reporters. (2024, August 14). Srettha dismissed as PM after court ruling. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/2847093/srettha-dismissed-as-pmafter-court-ruling
Pironnet, Q. (2020). Constitutional functions in Belgium. In R. Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 45-48). Hart Publishing.
Pongsudhirak, T. (2020). Democracy and monarchy in Thailand: Reconciliation or reckoning? SAIS Review of International Affairs, 40(2), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2020.0023
Pongsudhirak, T. (2025, July 4). Thai politics back at the brink (again). Bangkok Post.
Post Reporters. (2020, November 20). Prayut threatens protesters. Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/2022375/prayut-threatens-protesters
Powell, C. (2020). Spain: The coup of February 1981. In R. Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 57-59). Hart Publishing.
Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. (n.d.). The Constitution of Japan. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
Regan, H., & Olarn, K. (2024, August 16). Paetongtarn Shinawatra to become Thailand’s youngest prime minister in new political shake-up. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/08/16/asia/thailand-paetongtarn-shinawatra-prime-minister-intl-hnk/index.html
Regan, H., Yeung, J., & Olarn, K. (2023, August 22). Former PM Thaksin Shinawatra returns to a politically divided Thailand after 15 years of self-exile. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/21/asia/thaksin-shinawatra-return-thailand-parliament-vote-intl-hnk/index.html
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). The social contract (V. Gourevitch, Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1762)
Security Council Report. (2025, July 25). Cambodia–Thailand border clashes: Urgent private meeting. https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2025/07/cambodia-thailandborder-clashes-urgent-private-meeting.php
Sirinupong, P. (2014). Royal consent to a bill (Master’s thesis, Thammasat University). [In Thai].
Streckfuss, D. (2013). The future of the monarchy in Thailand. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia, 13. https://kyotoreview.org/issue-13/the-future-of-the-monarchy-in-thailand/
Tanakasempipat, P. (2024, July 11). Thai conservatives retain Senate control in blow to pro democracy groups. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-07-11/thai-conservatives-win-most-senate-seats-as-power-balance-set-to-shift
Thai PBS World’s Political Desk. (2024, August 22). Explainer: Why Thailand’s Constitutional Court has dissolved 111 parties since 1997. Thai PBS World. https://world.thaipbs.or.th/detail/explainer-why-thailands-constitutional-court-has-dissolved-111-partiessince-1997/54439
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2025). Democracy index 2024: What’s wrong with representative democracy? https://www.eiu.com/n/global-themes/democracy-index/
International IDEA. (2025). Countries rankings – The global state of democracy 2024. https://www.idea.int/gsod/2024/countries/
Torrance, D. (2024, May 22). The king and the dissolution of Parliament for a general election. House of Commons Library. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/the-king-and-the dissolution-of-parliament-for-a-general-election/
Uwanno, B. (1994). Public law II (4th ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai) Varieties of Democracy Institute. (2025). Democracy report 2025: 25 years of autocratization – Democracy trumped? https://www.v-dem.net/documents/54/v-dem_dr_2025_lowres_ v1.pdf
Wenander, H. (2020). The king and public power in the minimalist monarchy of Sweden. In R. Hazell & B. Morris (Eds.), The role of monarchies in modern democracy (pp. 32-36). Hart Publishing.
Winichakul, T. (2019). Thailand’s royal democracy in crisis. In Montesano M., Chong T., & Heng M. (Eds.), After the coup (pp. 284-285). ISEAS.
Wise, J. (2019). Thailand: History, politics and the rule of law. Marshall Cavendish Editions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thammasat Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and ideas expressed in all submissions published in Thammasat Review are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect that of the editors or the editorial board.
The copyright of all articles including all written content and illustrations belong to Thammasat Review. Any individuals or organisation wishing to publish, reproduce and distribute a particular manuscript must seek permission from the journal first.
