A Democratic ASEAN: Intergovernmentalism and Thin Democracy

William J Jones

ผู้แต่ง

William J Jones Mahidol University International College, Mahidol University, Thailand

คำสำคัญ:

ASEAN, Democracy ASEAN, ASEAN Democracy, Regionalism and Democracy, Democracy

บทคัดย่อ

The ASEAN Charter of 2007 upgraded the status of ASEAN from an informal organization of Cold War origins to a legally recognized regional organization that would in theory produce binding and credible agreements. The ASEAN Charter created the ASEAN Communities architecture in the image, but not the substance of the European Union. In this context, ASEAN affirmed in its legally binding treaty to uphold new normative understandings of human rights, rule of law, and democracy. This paper will conceptualize, problematize, and analyze the rhetoric to reality of an ASEAN as a democratic regional organization. The article demonstrates that current frameworks of a democratic ASEAN are misunderstood due to an analytical misalignment of units/levels of analysis. Lastly, the article argues that ASEAN is a democratic regional organization from a ‘thin’ definition and understanding of democracy.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Acharya, A. (1997). Ideas, identity, and institution‐building: From the “ASEAN way” to the “Asia‐Pacific way”?. The Pacific Review, 10(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749708719226

Acharya, A. (1999). Southeast Asia’s Democratic Moment. Asian Survey, 39(3), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/3021206

Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia : ASEAN and the problem of regional order (1st ed.). Routledge.

Acharya, A. (2003). Democratisation and the prospects for participatory regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000074646

Acharya, A. (2005). Do norms and identity matter? Community and power in Southeast Asia’s regional order. The Pacific Review, 18(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500047199

Aimsiranun, A. (2020). Comparative Study of the Legal Framework on General Differentiated Integration Mechanisms in the European Union, APEC, and ASEAN. Asian Development Bank Institute: ADBI Working Paper Series. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/579726/adbi-wp1107.pdf

Allan, J. (2006). Thin Beats Fat Yet again – Conceptions of Democracy. Law and Philosophy, 25(5), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-006-0004-x

Almond, G. A. (2000). The Study of Political Culture. In L. Crothers & C. Lockhart (Eds.), Culture and Politics: A Reader (pp. 5–20). Palgrave.

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.

Armstrong, K. (2008). Governance and Constitutionalism After Lisbon. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00782.x

Arnakim, L. Y., & Aqil, I. (2023). In Search of Democracy in Southeast Asia: Can the ASEAN Way Go Hand in Hand with Democracy? International Relations BINUS University. https://ir.binus.ac.id/2023/10/03/in-search-of-democracy-in-southeast-asia-can-the-asean-way-go-hand-in-hand-with-democracy/

ASEAN. (1967). The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration). https://agreement.asean.org/media/download/20140117154159.pdf

ASEAN. (1976a). The Declaration of ASEAN Concord, Bali, Indonesia. https://asean.org/the-declaration-of-asean-concord-bali-indonesia-24-february-1976/

ASEAN. (1976b). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. https://asean-aipr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Treaty-of-Amity-and-Cooperation-in-Southeast-Asia-1976-TAC.pdf

ASEAN. (1992). Singapore Declaration of 1992 Singapore, 28 January 1992.

https://asean.org/?static_post=singapore-declaration-of-1992-singapore-28-january-1992.

ASEAN. (2003). Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II). https://asean.org/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii/

ASEAN. (2007a). ASEAN Charter. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf

ASEAN. (2007b). Cha-am Hua Hin Declaration on the Roadmap for the ASEAN Community (2009–2015). https://asean.org/cha-am-hua-hin-declaration-on-the-roadmap-for-the-asean-community-2009-2015/

ASEAN. (2022). ASEAN Member States. https://asean.org/member-states/

Aviel, J. F. (2000). Placing human rights and environmental issues on Asean’s agenda: The role of non‐governmental organizations. Asian Journal of Political Science, 8(2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370008434168

Ba, A. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia. Stanford University Press.

Basu-Mellish, J. (2023). UN Resolution 1514: The creation of a new post-colonial sovereignty. Third World Quarterly, 44(6), 1306–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2180355

Bobbio, N. (1987). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game. University of Minnesota Press.

Chalermpalanupap, T. (2010). Life in ASEAN After the Entry into Force of the ASEAN Charter. In ASEAN: Life After the Charter (pp. 45–65). ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.

Christiansen, T. (2012). The European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: An Elusive “Institutional Balance”? In A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, & S. Ripley (Eds.), EU Law after Lisbon (pp. 228–247). Oxford University Press.

Cohen, J. (1998). Democracy and Liberty. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative Democracy (pp. 185–231). Cambridge University Press.

Collins, A. (2013). Norm diffusion and ASEAN’s adoption and adaption of global HIV/AIDS norms. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lct012

Confidential Department of ASEAN Affairs. (2021). Key points from the ASEAN Leaders Meeting. An ASEAN Member State.

Crombez, C. (2003). The Democratic Deficit in the European Union. European Union Politics, 4(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165030040 01583

Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press.

Dalton, R. J., Sin, T., & Jou, W. (2007). Understanding Democracy: Data from Unlikely Places. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2007.a223229

Davis, N. T., Goidel, K., & Zhao, Y. (2020). The Meanings of Democracy among Mass Publics. Social Indicators Research, 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02517-2

Destradi, S. (2019). The Finances of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In U. Engel & F. Mattheis (Eds.), The Finances of Regional Organisations in the Global South (p. Chapter 14). Routledge.

Drajat, G. M. (2022). ASEAN’s Socialization of Myanmar: Perilous Ambivalence, the 2021 Coup and the Way Forward. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(3), 453–481. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs44-3c

Easton, D. (1975). A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309

Emmerson, D. K. (2005). Security, Community, and Democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1468109905001829

Emmerson, D. K. (2007). Challenging ASEAN: A “Topological” View. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(3), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs29-3c

European Commission. (2024a). Commission considers that Hungary has not sufficiently addressed breaches of the principles of the rule of law and therefore maintains measures to protect the Union budget. European Commission - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_6465

European Commission. (2024b). EU budget for 2024. Consilium. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-annual-budget/2024-budget/

European Parliament. (2016). Article 50 TEU: Withdrawal of a Member State from the EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/577971/EPRS_BRI(2016)577971_EN.pdf

European Parliament. (n.d.). Overview | Ordinary legislative procedure | Ordinary Legislative Procedure | European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/olp/en/ordinary-legislative-procedure/overview

European Union. (2007). Treaty of Lisbon, (2007/C 306/01). Eur-Lex.europa.eu. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT

European Union. (2023). European Commission – what it does | European Union. https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/institutions-and-bodies/search-all-eu-institutions-and-bodies/european-commission_en

European Union. (n.d.). Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/treaty-on-the-functioning-of-the-european-union.html

Geissel, B. (2012). Evaluating democratic innovations: Curing the democratic malaise? Routledge.

Gomez, J., & Ramcharan, R. (2012). The Protection of Human Rights In Southeast Asia: Improving The Effectiveness of Civil Society. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 13(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1163/138819012x133232 34710062

Gomez, J., & Ramcharan, R. (2014). Democracy and Human Rights in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3), 3–17. https://doi.org/10. 1177/186810341403300301

Goodman, A. E. (1996). Vietnam and ASEAN: Who Would Have Thought it Possible? Asian Survey, 36(6), 592–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645793

Haacke, J. (2006). Myanmar and ASEAN. The Adelphi Papers, 46(381), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/05679320600831896

Haacke, J. (2008). ASEAN and Political Change in Myanmar: Towards a Regional Initiative? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(3), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-3a

Jones, L. (2009). Democratization and foreign policy in Southeast Asia: the case of the ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Myanmar Caucus. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903104008

Jones, L. (2011a). Beyond securitization: explaining the scope of security policy in Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), 403–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr002

Jones, L. (2011b). State Power, Social Conflicts and Security Policy in Southeast Asia. In R. Robison (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics (pp. 346–360). Routledge.

Jones, W. J. (2017). Human rights treaty ratification behavior: An ASEAN Way of creating regional standards. Journal of Global Analysis, 7(1), 9–35.

Jones, W., & Rhein, D. L. (2023). ASEAN’s credibility and centrality on the line amid crisis in Myanmar. East Asia Forum. https://doi.org/10.59425/eabc.1703541630

Katz, R. S. (2001). Models of Democracy. European Union Politics, 2(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002001003

Keane, J. (2014). Life and death of democracy. Readhowyouwant Com Ltd.

Kriesi, H. (2013). Democratic legitimacy: Is there a legitimacy crisis in contemporary politics? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 54(4), 609–638. https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2013-4-609

Landman, T. (2007). Developing Democracy: Concepts, Measures, and Empirical Relationships. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA).

https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/speeches/Developing-Democracy-Concepts-Measures-and-Empirical-Relationships-PDF.pdf

Laursen, F. (2014). The Lisbon Treaty: A First Assessment. L’Europe En Formation, 362(4), 45–70. https://www.cairn.info/revue-l-europe-en-formation-2011-4-page-45.htm

Leung, H. (2014). ASEAN and Human Rights: The Prospects of Implementing a Regional Mechanism for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in Southeast Asia. http://lawanddevelopment.org/docs/humanrightssea.pdf

Leviter, L. (2010). The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure? New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 43(4), 159–210. https://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/43.1-Leviter.pdf

Lu, J., & Shi, T. (2014). The battle of ideas and discourses before democratic transition: Different democratic conceptions in authoritarian China. International Political Science Review, 36(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0192512114551304

Manea, M. G. (2015). The Claims of the ASEAN to Human Rights and Democracy: What Role for Regional Civil Society? ASIEN, 136, 73–97. https://asien.asienforschung.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2015/10/07_ 136_Manea_ASEAN.pdf

Merkel, W., & Kneip, S. (2018). Democracy and crisis: challenges in turbulent times. Springer.

Müller, L. M. (2023). In the Shadow of the Member States. Palgrave Macmillan.

Munck, G. L. (2009). Measuring democracy: A bridge between scholarship and politics. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Narine, S. (1997). ASEAN and the ARF: The Limits of the “ASEAN Way.” Asian Survey, 37(10), 961–978. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645616

Narine, S. (1999). ASEAN into the twenty‐first century: Problems and prospects. The Pacific Review, 12(3), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512749 908719296

Natalegawa, R. M. M. M. (2017). The Expansion of ASEAN and the Changing Dynamics of southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 39(2), 232–238. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/70/article/667770

Nischalke, T. (2002). Does ASEAN measure up? Post-Cold War diplomacy and the idea of regional community. The Pacific Review, 15(1), 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740110110873

Norris, P. (1997). Representation and the democratic deficit. European Journal of Political Research, 32(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00342

Norris, P. (2020). Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics, 26(6), 135406882092768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820927686

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. F. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.

Olarn, K., & Regan, H. (2021, March 30). Thailand pushes back thousands fleeing Myanmar as death toll surpasses 500. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/30/asia/thailand-myanmar-refugees-intl-hnk/index.html

Orosa, T. J. C. (2012). ASEAN Integration in Human Rights: Problems and Prospects for Legalization and Institutionalization. Asian Regional Integration Review, 4, 66–88.

Osterberg-Kaufmann, N., & Stadelmaier, U. (2020). Measuring meanings of democracy—methods of differentiation. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 14(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-020-00461-6

Peou, S. (2014). The Limits and Potential of Liberal Democratisation in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 33(3), 19–47. https://doi.org/10. 1177/186810341403300302

Poon-Kim, S. (1977). A Decade of ASEAN, 1967-1977. Asian Survey, 17(8), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.2307/2643336

Przeworski, A. (1986). Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy. In P. O’Donnell, C. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives (Vol. 3). The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ruland, J. (2009). Deepening ASEAN cooperation through democratization? The Indonesian legislature and foreign policymaking. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(3), 373–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcp010

Rüland, J. (2012). The limits of democratizing interest representation: ASEAN’s regional corporatism and normative challenges. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354 066112445289

Rüland, J. (2020). Democratic backsliding, Regional Governance and Foreign Policymaking in Southeast Asia: ASEAN, Indonesia and the Philippines. Democratization, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1803284

Ryu, Y., & Ortuoste, M. (2014). Democratization, regional integration, and human rights: the case of the ASEAN intergovernmental commission on human rights. The Pacific Review, 27(3), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.909521

Schäfer, A. (2021). Cultural Backlash? How (Not) to Explain the Rise of Authoritarian Populism. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10. 1017/s0007123421000363

Schneider, Z. (2021). Through Thick and Thin: Understanding Democracy and its Consequences in the United States. Inquiries Journal, 13(9), 207–221. http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1907/through-thick-and-thin-understanding-democracy-and-its-consequences-in-the-united-states

Sebastian, L. C., & Lanti, I. G. (2010). Perceiving Indonesian Approaches to International Relations Theory. In A. Acharya & B. Buzan (Eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (pp. 148–173). Routledge.

Seidenfeld, M. (1992). A Civic Republican Justification for the Bureaucratic State. Harvard Law Review, 105(7), 1511. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341745

Singh, J. T. N. (2008). Process of Institutionalisation and Democratisation in ASEAN: Features, Challenges and Prospects of Regionalism in Southeast Asia. UNISCI Discussion Papers.

https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/media/www/pag-72513/ UNISCI%20DP%2016%20-%20Singh.pdf

Sirijintana, W. (2021). Putting ASEAN to Test: The Roles and Challenges of Resolving the Myanmar Political Crisis After the 2021 Coup. Graduate Review of Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 1(2), 1–16. https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GRPSPAJ/article/view/1091

Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge University Press.

Stubbs, R. (2008). The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions and the challenge to “global” governance. The Pacific Review, 21(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09512740802294713

Sukma, R. (2009). Democracy Building in South East Asia: The ASEAN Security Community and Options for the European Union. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). https://www.idea.int/sites/default/ files/publications/chapters/the-role-of-the-european-union-in-democracy-building/eu-democracy-building-discussion-paper-53.pdf

Than, M., & Gates, C. (2001). ASEAN enlargement: Impacts and implications. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Ulbricht, T. (2018). Perceptions and Conceptions of Democracy: Applying Thick Concepts of Democracy to Reassess Desires for Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(11), 1387–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758751

United Nations Security Council. (2021). Statement by the President of the Security Council. S/PRST/2021/5. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n21/063/38/pdf/n2106338.pdf?token=AnI0dgzdFEeS4PsDLO&fe=true

United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf

United Nations. (1960). Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/ instruments-.mechanisms/instruments/declaration-granting-independence-colonial-countries-and-peoples.

Verdun, A. (2013). Decision-Making before and after Lisbon: The Impact of Changes in Decision-Making Rules. West European Politics, 36(6), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.826021

Wunderlich, J.-U. (2012). Comparing regional organisations in global multilateral institutions: ASEAN, the EU and the UN. Asia Europe Journal, 10(2-3), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-012-0324-4

Yong, O. K. (2003). You are being redirected. http://www.asean.org/resources/2012-02-10-08-47-56/speeches-statements-of-the-formersecretaries-general-of-asean/item/the-future-of-asean-2