Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Use of Internet of Things (IOT) by Thai farmers
Keywords:
Internet of Things (IoT), acceptance of the Internet of Things, adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT), farmer modelsAbstract
The capacity of agricultural production in Thailand can be significantly improved by strengthening farmers’ skills. This article aims to present the factors influencing the acceptance and use of the Internet of Things (IoT) among 120 Thai farmers who voluntarily participated in workshops organized by the Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI) across 10 target areas. Primary data were collected through questionnaires and in-depth group interviews, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. The results reveal that extreme weather conditions, rising production costs, and declining product quality have become major challenges in the development of IoT-driven smart farming models. As a result, many farmers are now shifting their mindsets and actively seeking new opportunities to overcome existing and emerging challenges. A promising solution is the context-specific adoption of IoT technologies, tailored to local socio-agricultural conditions. This approach not only addresses current issues but also enhances farmers’ survival strategies and skill development. Two key groups have emerged in this process: farmers proficient in IoT and those using IoT-based systems. The study finds that the most influential factors driving IoT adoption among both groups include (1) efforts to raise plant-based production standards (2) reduction in production cost-related risks, and (3) supportive government policies promoting IoT use in agriculture-all with statistical significance at the 0.05 level.
References
Bhumibol Adulyadej. (1997, October 23). Speech at the Degree Conferring Ceremony, Kasetsart University. Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hongnak, P. (2023, July 27). A farmer participating in the training program on the application of IoT innovations and technologies: The agricultural way of our ancestors. Personal interview.
Karntaharn, T. (2023, July 27). A farmer participating in the training program on the application of IoT innovations and technologies: The agricultural way of our ancestors. Personal interview.
Katz Riaz, E., De Meyer, E. J., Dosov, B., & Nichterlein, K. (2014). Approaches to strengthening agricultural innovation systems (AIS) in Central Asia, South Caucasus and Turkey: Insights based on assessments of strengths and weaknesses of the AIS in Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Turkey. Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4310e
Khunthongjan, S., Athipanyakul, T., & Sairuamyat, S. (2021). Mechanism design for central agricultural driving toward Thailand modern agriculture (Full paper research report). Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI).
Meijer, S. S., Catacutan, D., Ajayi, O. C., Sileshi, G. W., & Nieuwenhuis, M. (2015). The role of knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of
Agricultural Sustainability, 13(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i-xx.
Nuthall, P. L. (2010). Farm business management: The human factor. SPi.
Office of Trade Policy and Strategy. (2023). Solutions for Thai agriculture… Modern and environmentally conscious farming [Online document]. https://uploads.tpso.go.th/ทางออกภาคเกษตรไทย%20เกษตรกรรมยุคใหม่ใส่ใจสิ่งแวดล้อม_1.pdf
Patchimpet, W. (2023, July 27). A farmer participating in the training program on the application of IoT innovations and technologies: The agricultural way of our ancestors. Personal interview.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
Thanisan, A. (2023, July 27). A farmer participating in the training program on the application of IoT innovations and technologies: The agricultural way of our ancestors. Personal interview.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
White, H., & Raitzer, D. A. (2017). Impact evaluation of development interventions: A practical guide. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/392376/impact-evaluation-development-interventions-guide.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thammasat Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and ideas expressed in all submissions published in Thammasat Review are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect that of the editors or the editorial board.
The copyright of all articles including all written content and illustrations belong to Thammasat Review. Any individuals or organisation wishing to publish, reproduce and distribute a particular manuscript must seek permission from the journal first.




