Analysis of Trends, Methods, Challenges, and Future Research in Agile Governance

cahyoko edi tando

Authors

cahyoko edi tando Departement of Community Guidance, Politeknik Pengayoman Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Conventional online behavior, Natural Language Processing, Sentiment, Time lag, Trend

Abstract

Agile governance is essential for effective public service delivery. This study explores trends, methods, challenges, and future directions, contributing to academic discourse and addressing unresolved research questions. The research method was systematic literature review (SLR). Research findings indicated that trend analysis has identified 14 common thematic areas studied using the specified keyword. One of the most predominant trends is digital transformation, disaster management, urban society sustainability, and public health, which have been the focus of several studies conducted from 2020 to 2024. Meanwhile, in terms of methodology, qualitative methods are the most commonly used, accounting for 63 percent, while quantitative methods make up 37 percent. The study also identified several fundamental challenges in research, including the lack of capability among informants, samples that do not adequately represent the population, and the difficulty in determining success indicators for programs related to agile governance. For future research, the study utilized the VosViewer application with the Overlay Visualization feature, which highlights several keywords that could serve as potential research topics, such as community, knowledge, and capacity organization. Additionally, methods that have been less frequently used, such as grounded theory and qualitative approaches with interview-based data collection, were still considered relevant. The study also recommends using the SmartPLS software for managing and analyzing complex datasets in future empirical research. A notable limitation of this study is its exclusive reliance on the ScienceDirect database, which may restrict the comprehensiveness of the literature reviewed.

References

Adam, A. G., Agegnehu, A. W., Dessie, B. T., & Minale, A. S. (2023). Responsible governance of land tenure in the context of investment from theory to practice: Lessons from Ethiopia. Research in Globalization, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100131

Alharbi, I. B. A., Jamil, R., Mahmood, N. H. N., & Shaharoun, A. M. (2019). Organizational innovation: A review paper. Open Journal of Business and Management, 07(03), 1196–1206. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.73084

Almazrouei, F., Elias Sarker, A., Zervopoulos, R., & Yousaf, S. (2024). Organizational structure, agility, and public value-driven innovation performance in the UAE public services. Heliyon, 10(13), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33261

Alves, M. F. R., Galina, S. V. R., & Dobelin, S. (2018). Literature on organizational innovation: Past and future. Innovation and Management Review, 15(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-01-2018-001

Amoujavadi, S., & Nemati, A. (2024). Developing sustainability, resiliency, agility, and security criteria for cloud service providers’ viability assessment: A comprehensive hierarchical structure. Sustainable Futures, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sffr.2024.100219

Ansari, M. S. A., Abouraia, M., El Morsy, R., & Thumiki, V. R. R. (2024). Influence of transformational and transactional leadership on agile project success. Project Leadership and Society, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100136

Asthana, S., Mukherjee, S., Phelan, A. L., Woo, J. J., & Standley, C. J. (2024). Singapore’s COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: An empirical analysis. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 49, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101137

Bainomugisha, E., & Mwotli, A. (2022). Crane Cloud: A resilient multi-cloud service abstraction layer for resource-constrained settings. Development Engineering, 7(100102), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100102

Bason, C., & Austin, R. D. (2022). Design in the public sector: Toward a human-centred model of public governance. Public Management Review, 24(11), 1727–1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1919186

Baxter, D., Dacre, N., Dong, H., & Ceylan, S. (2023). Institutional challenges in agile adoption: Evidence from a public sector IT project. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101858

Bell, I., Laurie, N., Calle, O., Carmen, M., & Valdez, A. (2024). Education for disaster resilience: Lessons from El Niño. Geoforum, 148, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103919

Bignami, D. F., Ambrogi, C., Bertulessi, M., Menduni, G., Pozzoni, M., & Zambrini, F. (2024). Governance strategies and tools towards the improvement of emergency management of natural disasters in transboundary areas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104704

Blaustein, J., Miccieli, M., Hendy, R., & Burns, K. H. (2023). Resilience policing and disaster management during Australia’s Black Summer bushfire crisis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103848

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being “systematic” in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26

Boland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student’s guide (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Bradlow, B. H. (2024). Urban social movements and local state capacity. World Development, 173, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106415

Breaugh, J., Rackwitz, R., & Hammerschmid, G. (2023). Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation: Evidence from Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101788

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80, 571–583.

Buganová, K., & Šimčáková, J. (2019). Risk management in traditional and agile project management. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.138

Cámara-Menoyo, C., Porto de Albuquerque, J., Suchomska, J., Tregonning, G., & McInerney, G. (2024). Co-designing grounded visualisations of the Food-Water-Energy nexus to enable urban sustainability transformations. Environmental Science and Policy, 154, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103712

Capatina, A., Blejoi, G., & Kalisz, D. (2024). Falling in love with strategic foresight, not only with technology: European deep-tech startups’ roadmap to success. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100515

Carrubbo, L., Cosimato, S., & Galdieri, A. R. (2024). Towards dynamic decision-making in government as service organization: Insights from systems thinking. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2024-0113

Chaffin, B. C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B. A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356

Chiu, M. L., & Lin, C. N. (2022). Developing supply chain open innovation capability: The mediating role of the knowledge creation process, governance mechanism and technology as a driver. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100264

Codreanu, A. (2016). A VUCA action framework for a VUCA environment. Leadership Challenges and Solutions, Journal of Defense Resources Management, 2, 31–38.

Cox, J. (2021). The higher education environment driving academic library strategy: A political, economic, social and technological (PEST) analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102219

Cristina, M., Nogueira, P., Oliveira, M. M., & Santos, C. (2024). Project management in healthcare: An examination of organizational competence. Heliyon, 10(15), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35419

Crusoe, J., Magnusson, J., & Eklund, J. (2024). Digital transformation decoupling: The impact

of willful ignorance on public sector digital transformation. Government Information

Quarterly, 41(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101958

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic

review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/

1111/padm.12209

Deininger, K., Xia, F., Kilic, T., & Moylan, H. (2021). Investment impacts of gendered land rights in customary tenure systems: Substantive and methodological insights from Malawi. World Development, 147, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105654

Du, J., & Chen, Z. (2018). Applying organizational ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.03.003

Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead – Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057

Elayah, M., & Al-Mansori, R. (2024). Yemen’s humanitarian collaboration during conflict: UN and local NGOs in focus. World Development Perspectives, 34, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2024.100585

Elliott, I. C., Oliveira, J. A. P. de, & Wu, A. M. (2024). Public administration and development in (historical) perspective. Public Administration and Development, 44, 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2052

Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2022). Strategic management in public services organizations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003054917

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511

Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.

García-Estévez, J., Vargas-Prieto, A., & Ariza, J. (2024). Mining-energy boom and local institutional capacities: The case of Colombia. Extractive Industries and Society, 17, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101387

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181

Goldin, I., & Vogel, T. (2010). Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: Lessons from the financial crisis. Global Policy, 1(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00011.x

Gómez-Leal, R., Holzer, A. A., Bradley, C., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Patti, J. (2022). The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership in school leaders: A systematic review. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1927987

Gonzalez, R. A., Ferro, R. E., & Liberona, D. (2020). Government and governance in intelligent cities, smart transportation study case in Bogotá, Colombia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 25–34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.05.002

Guenduez, A. A., Mergel, I., Schedler, K., Fuchs, S., & Douillet, C. (2024).Institutional work in smart cities: Interviews with smart city managers.Urban Governance, 4(1), 80–90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.01.003

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable

for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods,11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022).PRISMA 2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

Halla, P., Merino-Saum, A., & Binder, C. R. (2022). How to link sustainability assessments with local governance? Connecting indicators to institutions and controversies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106741

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J.,& Welch, V. A. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews ofinterventions (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2014). The two orders of governance failure: Design

mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and

Society, 33, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002

Hunter, M. (2022). Resilience, fragility, and robustness: Cities and COVID-19.Urban Governance, 1(2), 115–125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.004

Ibrahim, M. A. (2025). Agile governance in the implementation of integrated public

service technology in Bone Regency. Proceedings of the 2nd Doctoral International Conference, 1043–1054.https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i18.19523

Imjai, N., Promma, W., Usman, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2024). The intertwined effects

of digital literacy and agile mindset on design thinking skill and management control competency: Insights from Thai young accountants. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100244

Indiarti, E. D., & Lantu, D. C. (2022). The impact of agile leadership to business

resilience in the face of the VUCA era. Asian Journal of Research in Business

and Management, 4(3), 559–567.https://doi.org/10.55057/ajrbm.2022.4.3.48

Ingham, V., Wuersch, L., Islam, M. R., & Hicks, J. (2023). Indicators of community

disaster fatigue: A case study in the New South Wales Blue Mountains.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 95, 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103831

Irani, Z., Abril, R. M., Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2023). The impact of legacy systems on digital transformation in European public administration: Lessons learned from a multi-case analysis. Government Information Quarterly,40(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101784

Isip, M. I. G. (2022). Adaptive capability of micro agribusiness firms: Qualitative evidence from the Philippines. Research in Globalization, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100087

Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180

Jeleff, M., Haddad, C., & Kutalek, R. (2023). Between superimposition and local initiatives: Making sense of “implementation gaps” as a governance problem of antimicrobial resistance. SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 4, 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100332

Jing, Y., & Osborne, S. (2017). Public service innovations in China. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1762-9

Kaivo-oja, J. R. L., & Lauraeus, I. T. (2018). The VUCA approach as a solution concept

to corporate foresight challenges and global technological disruption. Foresight, 20(1), 27–49.https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-06-2017-0022

Karadimitriou, N., Magnani, G., Timmerman, R., Marshall, S., & Hudson-Smith, A.(2022). Designing an incubator of public spaces platform: Applying cybernetic principles to the co-creation of spaces. Land Use Policy, 119, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106187

Kim, J., & Kang, H. (2024). Bureaucratic burden or administrative capacity? Administrative intensity and fiscal performance of local governments. Public Management Review, 1–22.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2447314

Krigsholm, P., Riekkinen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2020). Pathways for a future cadastral system: A socio-technical approach. Land Use Policy, 94, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104504

Kroll, F., & Adelle, C. (2022). Lockdown, resilience and emergency statecraft in the Cape Town food system. Cities, 131, 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104004

Krombach, J., Gonzalez, J. N., Wittwer, R., Hubrich, S., Baumgart, F., & Gerike, R. (2024). How do German cities translate global sustainability visions into local mobility planning? A quantitative analysis of planners’ perspectives and priorities. Transport Policy, 154, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.06.003

Kunzler, A. M., Iannizzi, C., Burns, J., Metzendorf, M. I., Voigt-Radloff, S., Piechotta, V., Schmaderer, C., Holzmann-Littig, C., Balzer, F., Benstoem, C.,Binder, H., Boeker, M., Dirnagl, U., Fichtner, F., Golinski, M., Grundmann, H.,Hengel, H., Jabs, J., Kern, W. V., … Meerpohl, J. J. (2024). Informing pandemic management in Germany with trustworthy living evidence syntheses and guideline development: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence ecosystem. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 173, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111456

Lang, C., Siemens, G., Wise, A. F., Gašević, D., & Merceron, A. (2022). The handbook of learning analytics (2nd ed.). SoLAR.https://doi.org/10.18608/hla22

Lappi, T., & Aaltonen, K. (2017). Project governance in public sector agile software projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2),263–294.

Li, S., Jian, H., Zhou, L., & Qiu, L. (2021). A multiple case study on the cooperative governance model of treating environmental deterioration. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 19(1), 56–64.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.12.006

Lin, J., & Tao, J. (2024). Digital resilience: A multiple case study of Taobao village in rural China. Telematics and Informatics, 86, 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102072

Liu, H., Lee, C., & Goh, J. (2024). Introduction: Agile governance for a volatile,

uncertain, complex and ambiguous world. Global Policy, 15(S6), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13439

Love, P. E. D., Ika, L. A., Matthews, J., Li, X., & Fang, W. (2021). A procurement policy-making pathway to future-proof large-scale transport infrastructure assets. Research in Transportation Economics, 90, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2021.101069

Luchini, C., Stubbs, B., Solmi, M., & Veronese, N. (2017). Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 5(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i4.80

Lukman, S., & Hakim, A. (2024). Agile governance, digital transformation, and citizen satisfaction moderated by political stability in Indonesia’s socio-political landscape. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 11(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJECS/2001

Luna, A. J. H. de O., Kruchten, P., & de Moura, H. P. (2015). Agile governance theory: Conceptual development. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Management of Technology and Information System, 1–12.http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.06701

Luna, A. J. H. de O., Kruchten, P., Pedrosa, M. L. G. do E., Neto, H. R. d. A., & Moura, H. P. d. M. (2014). State of the art of agile governance: A systematic review. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(5), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2014.6510

Mancuso, I., Petruzzelli, A. M., Panniello, U., Frattini, F., & Del Giudice, M.(2024). Nurturing strategic agility through corporate venturing advisory: An exploratory analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 121, 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.06.012

Maqdliyan, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of public sector organizational innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100042

Mendes, V. (2022). Climate smart cities? Technologies of climate governance in Brazil. Urban Governance, 2(2), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.08.002

Meng, W., Wang, F., & Xin, G. (2024). Making agile governance work: The community

grid as a ‘safety valve’ institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal

of Chinese Governance, 9(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2024.2332005

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2019). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

Mergel, I. (2024). Social affordances of agile governance. Public Administration Review, 84(5), 932–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13787

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161–165.

https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13202

Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003

Michalides, M., Bursac, N., Nicklas, S. J., Weiss, S., & Paetzold, K. (2023). Analyzing current challenges on scaled agile development of physical products. Procedia CIRP, 119, 1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.188

Millar, C. C. J. M., Groth, O., & Mahon, J. F. (2018). Management innovation in a VUCA world: Challenges and recommendations. California Management Review, 61(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618805111

Modesti, P. A., Reboldi, G., Cappuccio, F. P., Agyemang, C., Remuzzi, G., Rapi, S., Perruolo, E., Parati, G., Okechukwu, O. S. (2016). Panethnic differences in blood pressure in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147601

Motsumi, K. O., Ziervogel, G., & New, M. (2023). Drought governance: A cross-level governance analysis in Botswana. Climate Risk Management, 42, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100557

Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen–state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009

Mulyana, R., Rusu, L., & Perjons, E. (2024). Key ambidextrous IT governance mechanisms for successful digital transformation: A case study of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI). Digital Business, 4(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2024.100083

Mutiarin, D., Sudiro, R., & Misran, M. (2021). Design of e-public service in realizing agile government based on information technology: Case study in Indonesia. IAPA Proceedings Conference, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2021.512

Neumann, O., Kirklies, P. C., & Schott, C. (2024). Adopting agile in government: A comparative case study. Public Management Review, 26(12), 3692–3714. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2354776

Nolte, I. M., & Lindenmeier, J. (2024). Creeping crises and public administration: A time for adaptive governance strategies and cross-sectoral collaboration? Public Management Review, 26(11), 3104–3125.

Nurhaeni, I. D. A., Nurdin, A., Wiratama, P., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). Gendered-perspective agile leadership in the VUCA era during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.70490

Ogunkan, D. V. (2022). Achieving sustainable environmental governance in Nigeria: A review for policy consideration. Urban Governance, 2(1), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.04.004

Ohoiwutun, Y., Muttaqin, M. Z., Tebay, V., Ilham, & Renyaan, D. (2023). The role of the central and regional governments of Indonesia in the Indonesia–PapuaNew Guinea border development policy. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 13(3), 39–52.

Oliveira, M. C., & Siqueira, L. (2022). Digitalization between environmental activism and counter-activism: The case of satellite data on deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Earth System Governance, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100135

Osborne, S. P. (2002). Public management: Policy making, ethics and accountability in public management. Taylor & Francis.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

Pahlevan-Sharif, S., Mura, P., & Wijesinghe, S. (2019). A systematic review of systematic reviews in tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 39, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.04.001

Polese, F., Troisi, O., Carrubbo, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2018). An integrated framework toward public system governance: Insights from viable systems approach. In Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance (Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020180000006002

Popa, I., Ștefan, S. C., Olariu, A. A., & Popa, Ș. C. (2024). Integrating digitalization opportunities into innovative public organizations’

management process. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100564

Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

Purdy, J. M. (2012). A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02525.x

Razzano, C. C., & Bernardi, M. (2024). Empowering urban resilience: Grassroots volunteering for a renewed shock-response governance in post-pandemic Milan. Urban Governance, 4(4), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.12.006

Ritz, A., Sinelli, P., & Neumann, O. (2016). New public management in der Schweiz: Reform-Evaluationen und Stand der Entwicklungen. In A. Bergmann et al. (Eds.), Praxishandbuch Public Management (pp. 80–105). WEKA Verlag.

Robinson, J., Harrison, P., Shen, J., & Wu, F. (2021). Financing urban development: Three business models—Johannesburg, Shanghai and London. Progress in Planning, 154, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2020.100513

Sacchetti, S., & Borzaga, C. (2021). The foundations of the “public organisation”: governance failure and the problem of external effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(3), 731–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09525-x

Sainz-Santamaria, J., & Martinez-Cruz, A. L. (2022). Adaptive governance of urban green spaces across Latin America – Insights amid COVID-19. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 74, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127629

Sam, M., Nonci, N., Nilwana, A., & Putra, M. A. A. (2024). Public accountability in the management of nonperforming loans in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration, 23(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-24-23-4-02

Schintler, L. A., & McNeely, C. L. (2022). Artificial intelligence, institutions, and resilience: Prospects and provocations for cities. Journal of Urban Management, 11(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004

Scupola, A., & Mergel, I. (2022). Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650

Siangulube, F. S., Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Reed, J., Moombe, K. B., & Sunderland, T. (2023). Multistakeholder platforms for integrated landscape governance: The case of Kalomo District, Zambia. Land Use Policy, 135, 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106944

Simonofski, A., Ayed, H., Vanderose, B., & Snoeck, M. (2018). From traditional to agile e-government service development: Starting from practitioners’ challenges. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2018), 1–10.

Siregar, A. A., Afiff, A. Z., & Halim, R. E. (2023). Linking agile leadership and business sustainability through the mediation of political and social capabilities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100153

Steen, T. I., & Schott, C. (2019). Public sector employees in a challenging work environment. Public Administration, 97(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12572

Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x

Strokosch, K., & Osborne, S. P. (2020). Debate: If citizen participation is so important, why has it not been achieved? Public Money & Management, 40(1), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654322

Tajima, R., Tsuji, T., Suzuki, K., & Muhamad, A. F. (2023). Conceptualizing disaster waste governance using network governance perspectives. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 99, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104137

Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2021). Adaptive governance of autonomous vehicles: Accelerating the adoption of disruptive technologies in Singapore. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101546

Tang, S. Y. (2021). Rethinking local and regional governance in China: An institutional design and development perspective. Urban Governance, 1(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.002

Taskan, B., Junça-Silva, A., & Caetano, A. (2022). Clarifying the conceptual map of VUCA: A systematic review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2022-3136

Thorn, J. P. R., Biancardi Aleu, R., Wijesinghe, A., Mdongwe, M., Marchant, R. A., & Shackleton, S. (2021). Mainstreaming nature-based solutions for climate resilient infrastructure in peri-urban sub-Saharan Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 216, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104235

Tomaževič, N., Kovač, P., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., Babaoğlu, C., Bohatá, M., Hirsch, B., Kulaç, O., Nurlybaeva, G. K., Schäfer, F. S., & Aristovnik, A. (2023). The role of agile values in enhancing good governance in public administration during the COVID-19 crisis: An international survey. Administrative Sciences, 13(12), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13120248

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.011

Tripp, J. F., & Armstrong, D. J. (2018). Agile methodologies: Organizational adoption motives, tailoring, and performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1220240

van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2023). Literature review papers: The search and selection process. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197703

Wasistiono, S., & Anggraini, W. (2019). Three paradigms in government (good governance, dynamic governance, and agile governance). International Journal of Kybernology, 4(2), 79–91. www.ombudsmanassociation.org/docs/BIOAGo

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2024). Experimentation in software engineering (2nd ed.). Springer Berlin, Heidelberg.

Woodall, B., Amekudzi-Kennedy, A., Inchauste, M. O., Sundararajan, S., Medina, A., Smith, S., & Popp, K. (2024). Institutional resilience and disaster governance: How countries respond to black swan events. Progress in Disaster Science, 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100329

Worley, C. G., & Jules, C. (2020). COVID-19’s uncomfortable revelations about agile and sustainable organizations in a VUCA world. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320936263

Xu, M., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tang, Y., & Li, J. (2024). How digital transformation enhances corporate innovation performance: The mediating roles of big data capabilities and organizational agility. Heliyon, 10(14), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34905

Yu, L., Lu, W., Choguill, C., & Li, M. (2023). Liangshan Bank, a hybrid model of payment for ecosystem services governance in rural development: The case of Baofu, China. Habitat International, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102879

Zerbian, T., Escario-Chust, A., Palau-Salvador, G., & Segura-Calero, S. (2023). The multiple and contested worlds of urban food governance: The case of the city of Valencia. Cities, 141, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104516