Democracy under Threat: Post-Truth Politics and Democracy in the Philippines
Keywords:
democracy, narratives, politics, post-truth, technologyAbstract
Today, the political landscape where boundaries between fact and fiction have been blurred have extended to reach the regions of the Global South, like the Philippines. In this growing traction in search for truths, this paper investigates the intersections between post-truth politics, social media, and democracy in the Philippines. First, it will argue that the technical conditions for the rise of an omnipresence of (dis) information has supported the post-truth environment in the Philippines. Second, the paper will further argue that post-truth, as it takes place in the Philippines today, mobilizes what we will call as the paradox of disinformation-based “truths” (DBTs). DBTs result from post-truth’s tendency towards alternate truths which ironically blur the lines between truth and falsity. DBTs will be traced through the political discourse propagated by both state and non-state actors. Through critical discourse analysis aided by distant (digital) reading, it will analyze the Facebook pages of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) and the tandem presidency of Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and Sara Duterte. What characterizes the Philippine situation today is the widespread proliferation of DBTs that, on the one hand, potentially challenge the democratic exercise of reflection and discernment and, on the other hand, tend towards authoritarian consolidation. Democracy is threatened both by the incapacity to discern and the institutional and state-initiated efforts to consolidate authoritarianism.
References
ABS-CBN News. (2021, May 14). Charges vs 7 Arrested Lumads in Cebu School Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. ABS-CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/05/14/21/chargesbakwit-7-cebu-dismissed
Africa, Sonny. 2019, (November 17). Counterproductive Counterinsurgency. Ibon. https://www.ibon.org/counterproductive-counterinsurgency/
Arnaud, Damien. (2019). How the ‘Post-Truth’ Phenomenon Harms Political Dialogue between States. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, (14), 480-498. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-14401079
Auerbach, David B. (2023). Meganets: How Digital Forces Beyond Our Control Commandeer Our Daily Lives and Inner Realities. PublicAffairs.
BBC News. (2016, November 16). “Post-truth” Declared Word of the Year by Oxford Dictionaries. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37995600
Bolledo, Jairo. (2022, September 22). Manila Court Junks DOJ’s Petition Seeking to Declare CPP-NPA as Terrorists. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/nation/manila-court-junks-dojpetition-
seeking-declare-cpp-npa-terrorists/
Cosentino, G. (2020). Social media and the post-truth world order. Palgrave.
Curato, N. (2017). Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(1): 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1281661
Feenberg, A. 2023. The Ruthless Critique of Everything Existing: Nature and Revolution in Marcuse’s Philosophy of Praxis. Verso Books.
Feldstein, S. (2021). The rise of digital repression: How technology is reshaping power, politics, and resistance. Oxford University Press.
Giusti, S. & Piras, E. (2020). Democracy and Fake News: Information Manipulation and Post-Truth Politics. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Giusti, S. & Piras, E. (2021). Introduction: In Search of Paradigms: Disinformation, Fake News, and Post-Truth Politics. In Serena Giusti and Elisa Piras, eds., Democracy and Fake News: Information Manipulation and Post-Truth Politics, pp. 1-16. Routledge.
Hannon, M. (2023). The Politics of Post-Truth. Critical Review 35: 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2023.2194109
Hao, K. (2021). How Facebook Got Addicted to Spreading Misinformation. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/03/11/1020600/facebook-responsibleai-misinformation/
Hapal, D. K. & Serafica, R. (2021, October 3). New War: How the Propaganda Network Shifted from Targeting “Addicts” to Activists. Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/investigative/how-propaganda-network-created-online-environment-justifies-shifted-killingactivists/
Hoggan-Kloubert, T., & Hoggan, C. (2023). Post-truth as an epistemic crisis: The need for rationality, autonomy, and pluralism. Adult Education Quarterly, 73(1), 3-20.
Hyvönen, A. E. (2018). Careless Speech: Conceptualizing Post-Truth Politics. New Perspectives 26: 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1802600303
Ihde, D. (2004). A Phenomenology of Technics. In David Kaplan, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Rowman & Littlefield.
Imbong, R. A. (2021). On Transistor Radios and Authoritarianism: The Politics of Radio- Broadcasted Distance Learning. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(2). https://www.pdcnet.org/techne/content/techne_2021_0999_4_23_137?file_type=pdf
Imbong, R. A. (2023). Chapter 3: The Performativity of Terror-Tagging and the Prospects for a Marcos Presidency. In Ronald A. Imbong, ed., Authoritarian Disaster: The Duterte Regime and the Prospects for a Marcos Presidency, pp. 43-64. Nova Science Publishers. https://novapublishers.com/shop/chapter-3-the-performativity-of-terror-tagging-and-the-prospects-for-a-marcos-presidency/
Kalpokas, I. (2018). A Political Theory of Post-Truth. Springer.
Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Publishing Group.
Kinsta. (2018, December 28). Wild and Interesting Facebook Statistics and Facts (2023). Kinsta®. https://kinsta.com/blog/facebook-statistics/
Kovalova, T. V. & Yevtushenko, O. (2022). Overcoming the Challenges of Post-Truth in Modern Socio-Cultural Communication. Obraz, 1(38). https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/88007
Labiste, M. D. (2022, December 13). Fact-Checking in the Philippines: The Quest to End Disinformation in Elections. Fulcrum: Analysis on Southeast Asia. https://fulcrum.sg/factchecking-in-the-philippines-the-quest-to-end-disinformation-in-elections/
Martin, N. (2017). Journalism, the Pressures of Verification, and Notions of Post-Truth in Civil Society. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5476
Mongaya, K. M. (2023). Chapter 1: Fascism, Fascisation, and Neoliberalism from Marcos to Duterte. In Ronald A. Imbong, ed., Authoritarian Disaster: The Duterte Regime and the Prospects for a Marcos Presidency, pp. 1-24. Nova Science Publishers. https://
novapublishers.com/shop/chapter-1-fascism-fascisation-and-neoliberalism-frommarcos-to-duterte/
Newberry, C. (2023). 42 Facebook Statistics Marketers Need to Know in 2023. Hootsuite Blog. https://blog.hootsuite.com/facebook-statistics/
Pangalangan, R. L. A., Fernandez, G. B., & Tugade, R. R. L. (2018). Marcosian atrocities: Historical revisionism and the legal constraints on forgetting. Asia-pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 19(2), 140-190.
Panol, Z. (2000). Filipino American Media Use: Implications for Intercultural Relations. Public Relations Review 26(3): 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00043-6
Petricone, F. (2021). Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation. Church, Communication and Culture 6: 408-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2021.1945936
Quimpo, N. G. (2005). Oligarchic Patrimonialism, Bossism, Electoral Clientelism, and Contested Democracy in the Philippines. Critical Asian Studies, 37(3): 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672760500226724
Ragragio, J. L. D. (2021). Strongman, patronage and fake news: Anti-human rights discourses and populism in the Philippines. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(6), 852-872.
Rietdijk, N. (2021). Post-Truth Politics and Collective Gaslighting. Episteme. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.24
Rocamora, J. (1998). Philippine Political Parties, Electoral System, and Political Reform. Philippine International Review, 1(1): 3-24.
Schindler, S. (2020). The Task of Critique in Times of Post-Truth Politics. Review of International Studies 46: 376-394. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000091
Sushpanova, I. S. (2019). “Post-Truth” in Social Reality: Risks and Threats. Sociological Studies. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003173-3
Tandoc, E. C. (2019). Trolling and Disinformation in Social Media: The Roles of the Media in the Philippine Elections. Journalism, 21(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
Tandoc, E. C. (2020). Journalism and Social Media in the Philippines: From New to Norm. In W. Lowrey and P. J. Gade, eds., Reconceptualizing Journalism in a Digital Age, pp. 5-25. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119714491.ch1
Tatcho, O. B. (2021). Post-truth and rhetorical citizenship in the Philippines: Campaigns against truth and how to fight back. The University of Alabama.
Tessier, D. (2020). The Needle in the Haystack: How Information Overload Is Impacting Society and Our Search for Truth. In Navigating Fake News, Alternative Facts, and Misinformation in a Post-Truth World, pp. 18-35. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-
-7998-2543-2.ch002
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2015). How gatekeeping still matters: Understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In T. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (Eds.) Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 25-44). Routledge.
Visvizi, A. & Lytras, M.(2019). Politics and ICT: Issues, Challenges, Developments. In Anna Visvizi and Miltiadis Lytras, eds., Politics and Technology in the Post-Truth Era, pp. 1-8. Emerald Publishing.
Webb, A. (2022). Chasing freedom: The Philippines’ long journey to democratic ambivalence. Liverpool University Press.
Winner, L. (2014). Do Artifacts Have Politics? In R. Scharff and V. Dusek, eds., Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, Second Edition, pp. 668-679. Wiley Blackwell.
Yan, A. & Wu, Y. (2021). An Analysis of China’s Tactics of International Public Opinion Warfare Against the Epidemic in the Context of “Post-Truth.” Journal of Innovation and Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.53469/jissr.2021.08(10).14
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thammasat Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and ideas expressed in all submissions published in Thammasat Review are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect that of the editors or the editorial board.
The copyright of all articles including all written content and illustrations belong to Thammasat Review. Any individuals or organisation wishing to publish, reproduce and distribute a particular manuscript must seek permission from the journal first.
