Hedging in Disguise: South Korea and ASEAN’s Alignment Behaviours Amid Great Powers Competition

Resi Qurrata Aini

doi:10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241470

Authors

Resi Qurrata Aini Department of Political Economy, King’s College London and Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241470

Keywords:

Alignment Behaviour, Co-Hedging, Great Powers Rivalry, Asymmetrical Relations, South Korea–ASEAN

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the simultaneous hedging patterns employed by a state and regional institution with differing alignment positions. South Korea is a traditional ally of the US while ASEAN is a non-aligned institution. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study employs the Causal Process Tracing (CPT) method to explain the behaviour of South Korea and ASEAN.
This article identifies a kind of hedging pattern, termed “co-hedging” that can be executed concurrently by a regional institution and an extra-regional middle power amid great powers competition. This co-hedging behavior affirms the structural realist postulate that systemic pressures shape state behavior, while simultaneously integrating the constructivist perspective on the role of shared norms within multilateral platform. Despite originating from distinct alignment positions and not primarily intending to co-hedge, both South Korea and ASEAN exhibit a relatively similar pattern of power acceptance and rejection towards great powers through their shared membership in multilateral forums. While South Korea operates within a narrower hedging spectrum compared to ASEAN, they optimize their partnerships by supporting each other’s initiatives, such as the Korea–ASEAN Solidarity Initiative (KASI) and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP).

References

Ahrari, M. E. (1999). The beginning of a new cold war? European Security, 8(3), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839908407419

AIIB. (2022). Members and prospective members of the bank. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Retrieved January 13, 2022, from https://www.aiib.org/en/about-aiib/governance/members-of-bank/index.html

Aini, R. Q. (2024). KASI and Korea - Indonesia’s middle powers interests: Converging the differences? IR Commentaries, 5(1). https://ir.fisip.ui.ac.id/en/kasi-and-korea-indonesiamiddle-power-interests-converging-the-differences/

Aini, R. Q., & Triantama, F. (2021). The implementation of South Korea’s military technology reform in the perspective of techno-nationalism. Sospol: Jurnal Sosial Politik, 7(1), 47-61. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/sospol/article/view/14581/9176

ASEAN - Korea Centre. (2019). ASEAN-Korea relations. Retrieved January 9, 2019, from https://www.aseankorea.org/eng/ASEAN/ak_overview.asp

ASEAN Regional Forum. (2004). ASEAN regional forum. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved March 6, 2019, from https://aseanregionalforum.asean.org/about-arf/

ASEAN Secretariat. (2020). ASEAN-China economic relation. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved January 11, 2020, from https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community/integration-with-global-economy/asean-china-economic-relation/

Asian Development Bank. (2011). Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian century. In. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270349

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2007). Chairman’s statement of the second East Asia summit, Cebu, Philippines, 15 January 2007. ASEAN Secretariat Retrieved from https://asean.org/%ef%bb%bfchairmans-statement-of-the-second-east-asia-summit-cebuphilippines-15-january-2007/

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2009). The joint media statement of the 12th ASEAN plus three finance ministers’ meeting, Bali, Indonesia, 3 May 2009. ASEAN Secretariat. https://asean.org/the-joint-media-statement-of-the-12thasean-plus-three-finance-ministers-meeting-bali-indonesia-3-may-2009/

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2021a, July 6). ASEAN, ROK to further strengthen partnership. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://asean.org/asean-rok-to-further-strengthen-partnership/

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2021b). Overview of ASEAN plus three cooperation. ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved January 19, 2009, from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ASEAN-Plus-Three-Document-Series-2005-2010.pdf

Bajpai, P. (2021, June 16). Emerging markets: Analyzing South Korea’s GDP. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/091115/emerging-markets-analyzing-south-koreas-gdp.asp

Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Case studies: Toward a generic and multidimensional definition, dalam designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in Small-N Research. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cheong, I. (2008). Korea’s position in the ASEAN+3 process: Review of performance and policy implications. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 22(2), 63-95. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23257897

Choe, W. (2021, December 3). Korea’s middle power ambition and new Southern policy International Conference on Assessing Seoul’s New Southern Policy Plus: Perspectives from ASEAN, Korea and India, Singapore.

Colin. (2021, November 10). S.Korea, ASEAN Launch New Defense Ministerial DIalogue. Yonhap. https://m-en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20211110009400325

Dewitt, D. (1994). Common, comprehensive, and cooperative Security. Pacific Review, 7(1), 1-15.

Dexian, C. C. (2013). Hedging for maximum flexibility: Singapire’s pragmatist approach to security relations with the US and China. Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, 39(2).

Erika, N. (2022, January 13). South Korea’s supply chain reliance on China leaves it more exposed than the US, Japan: report. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3163101/south-koreas-supply-chain-reliance-china-leaves-itmore?module=perpetual_scroll_0&pgtype=article&campaign=3163101

Goh, E. (2007). Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies. International Security, 32(3), 113-157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30130520

Goh, E. (2011). Institutions and the great power bargain in East Asia: ASEAN’s limited ‘brokerage’ role. In R. Emmers (Ed.), ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia (1st ed.). Routledge. (1 ed., pp. 248). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doiorg/10.4324/9780203804650

Ho, S. (2021). A Singaporean perspective on the NSP Plus’ outreach efforts towards ASEAN. International Conference on Assessing Seoul’s New Southern Policy Plus: Perspectives from ASEAN, Korea and India, Singapore.

Hu, W., & Meng, W. (2020). The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response. China Review, 20(3), 143-176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26928115

Hundt, D., & Bleiker, R. (2007). Reconciling colonial memories in Korea and Japan. Asian Perspective, 31(1), 61-91.

Kapur, L. (2019). The ASEAN-U.S. maritime exercise and maritime security. In A. M. T. I.-. CSIS (Ed.).

Karim, M. F. (2018). Middle power, status-seeking and role conceptions: The cases of Indonesia and South Korea. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1443428

Kim, J. (2018, April 27). South Korea’s free and open Indo-Pacific dilemma. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/05/south-koreas-free-and-open-indo-pacific-dilemma/

Kim, M.-h. (2018). Avoiding being a crushed prawn and becoming a dolphin swimming between the two fighting whales? South Korea’s strategic choice in the face of the intensifying Sino–US competition. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(4), 612-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909617709488

Kuik, C.-C. (2016). How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714

Kurniawan, Y. (2016). One Belt One Road (OBOR): Agenda keamanan liberal tiongkok? Jurnal Politica, 7(2), 233-254. https://dprexternal3.dpr.go.id/index.php/politica/article/viewFile/1135/622

Kusumasomantri, A. R. (2018). “Strategi hedging Indonesia terhadap Klaim Teritorial Tiongkok di Laut Tiongkok Selatan. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 17(1), 48-80. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/global/vol17/iss1/4

Kwak, T.-h. (1982). US - Korea Security Relations. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 2(2), 260-278. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23253960?seq=1

Laksmana, E. A., & Mantong, A. W. (2021). Missing pillars of strategic autonomy? Securitycooperation between Korea and ASEAN. In K. H. Lee & Y. J. Ro (Eds.), The New Southern Policy Plus: Progress and Way Forward. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.

Lee, Y. (2021). Riding the tide: Assessing South Korea’s hedging strategy through regional security initiatives. The Pacific Review. https://www.scilit.net/article/802ab3d82697dede1b072527604670ff

Liao, J. C., & Dang, N.-T. (2020). The nexus of security and economic hedging: Vietnam’s strategic response to Japan–China infrastructure financing competition. The Pacific Review, 33(3-4), 669-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1599997

Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-pacific stability. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1162/016366005774859724

Mission of the Republic of Korea to ASEAN. (2021). The mission of the ROK to ASEAN. ROK Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Retrieved January 8, 2021, from https://overseas.mofa.go.kr/asean-en/wpge/m_2557/contents.do

Moon, C.-i., & Lee, J.-Y. (2008). The revolution in military affairs and the defence industry in South Korea. Security Challenges, 4(4), 117-134. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26459813

Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations. Alfred A Knopf.

Neuman, L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Parameswaran, P. (2018, October 22). Why the first China-ASEAN maritime exercise matters. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/why-the-first-china-asean-maritimeexercise-matters/

Parameswaran, P. (2022, January 6). What’s next for ASEAN - South Korea security ties. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/01/whats-next-for-asean-south-korea-securityties/

Permanent Mission of Republic of Indonesia for ASEAN. (2018). Hubungan Kemitraan ASEANROK. Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. Retrieved 8th of January from https://kemlu.go.id/ptri-asean/en/pages/republik_korea/973/etc-menu

Putri, R. A. A. K. (2018). Political leadership in South Korea’s developmental state: A historical revisit. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 6(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v6i1.4927

Rymarenko, M. (2021). Institutional strategies in regional role location process: ASEAN, China, and great power management in ADMM Plus. International Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00317-0

Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(1), 72-107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539149

Schweller, R. L. (1997). New realist research on alliances: Refining, not refuting, Waltz’s Balancing Proposition. Source: The American Political Science Review, 91(4), 927-930. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952176

Sean, C. V. (2023). Enhancing ASEAN maritime cooperation: Peace, stability and balancing interests. Australia: Republic of Indonesian Navy – Royal Australian Navy Joint Publication. https://maritimejournal.id/index.php/jmi/article/download/159/121

Shekhar, V. (2012). ASEAN’s Response to the rise of China: Deploying a hedging strategy. China Report, 48(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445512462314

Shin, S.-o. (2016). South Korea’s elusive middlepowermanship: regional or global player? The Pacific Review, 29(2), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013494

Soong, J.-J. (2021). Perception and strategy of ASEAN’s states on China’s footprints under Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Perspectives of state-society-business with balancingbandwagoning-hedging consideration. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 1-8. https://doi.or

g/10.1080/10971475.2020.1809813

Soong, J.-J., & Aung, K. H. (2021). Myanmar’s perception and strategy toward China’s BRI expansion on three major projects development: Hedging strategic framework with statemarket-society analysis. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2020.1809815

Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism? Asian Survey, 42(3), 440-455. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.440

Suryani, N. P. E. (2015). Korean wave sebagai Instrumen soft power untuk Memperoleh Keuntungan Ekonomi Korea Selatan [Korean wave;soft power;keuntungan ekonomi;Korea Selatan]. 2015, 16(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v16i1.8

Teo, S. (2018). Middle power identities of Australia and South Korea: comparing the Kevin Rudd/Julia Gillard and Lee Myung-bak administrations. The Pacific Review, 31(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1371210

Terada, T. (2009). The Origin of ASEAN+6: Japan’s initiatives and the agent-strucure framework. In W. University (Ed.). Japan.

Thayer, C. A. (2017). ASEAN’S long march to a code of conduct in the South China sea. In M.Issues (Ed.), Politics.

Trading Economics. (2022). China exports to South Korea. Trading economics. Retrieved 13th of January from https://tradingeconomics.com/china/exports/south-korea

Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security, 9(4), 3-43.

Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Wang, T. Y., & Tan, A. C. (2021). Balancing, bandwagoning or hedging: Taiwan’s strategic choices in the era of a rising China. Political Science, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00323187.2021.1967765

Xinhua. (2019). Sea phase of ADMM-Plus exercise concludes in Singapore. Xinhua. Retrieved 6th of March from https://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-05/12/c_138053032.htm?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Yates, R. (2017). ASEAN as the ‘regional conductor’: understanding ASEAN’s role in Asia-Pacific order. The Pacific Review, 30(4), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1264458

Yong-in, L. (2019, November 28). [Column] South Korea’s “support of the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific”. The Hankyoreh. http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/english_editorials/918905.html

Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894

Zhao, S. (2015). A new model of big power relations? China–US strategic rivalry and balance of power in the Asia–Pacific. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(93), 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.953808