The Development of Mindfulness, Wisdom, and Virtue Indicators according to Buddhist-Based Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241607Keywords:
Buddhist-Based Principles, Development, Indicators, Mindfulness, Wisdom and VirtueAbstract
In a world shaped by rapid scientific and technological advancements, cultivating mindfulness, wisdom, and virtue is essential for navigating societal changes effectively. T his study utilized a mixed-method research design, with 3 objectives, namely: 1. to collect, analyze, and synthesize the knowledge on mindfulness, wisdom, and virtue according to Buddhist Principles and Modern Science, 2. to develop mindfulness, wisdom, and virtue indicators according to Buddhist-based principles, and 3. to evaluate the quality of mindfulness, wisdom, and virtue indicators according to Buddhist-based principles. The qualitative design included a documentary study, in-depth interviews with 7 key informants, and a focus group discussion with 8 education specialists. The quantitative component surveyed 375 Buddhist students from Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University (MCU) and Mahamakut Buddhist University (MBU). The 5 Content Validity Index (CVI) and Item Objective Congruence (IOC) experts examined interview forms and questionnaires. Data analysis utilized descriptive and inferential statistics to ensure accuracy and reliability. The findings highlighted that mindfulness (sati) helped people stay present and emotionally balanced, wisdom (paññā) improved problem-solving and adaptability, and virtue (sīla or guṇa-dhamma) encouraged ethical behavior and responsibility. A total of 39 key indicators were developed under three main components: mindfulness, wisdom, and virtue rooted in the Threefold Training (tisikkha), with thirteen sub-components, aligning with Buddhist teachings and modern science. The students strongly agreed on the importance of these qualities in daily life. Experts emphasized that measuring these traits should focus on real-life actions rather than self-reported opinions.
References
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
Bodhi, Bhikkhu. (Tran.) (1995). The middle length discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. Wisdom Publications.
Bodhi, Bhikkhu. (Tran.) (2000). The connected discourses of the Buddha: A new translation of the
Saṃyutta Nikāya. Vol. II. 2 Vols. set. Oxford: PTS.
Carpenter, J. E. (Ed.) (1976). The Dīgha Nikāya. Vol.III. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.
Chalmers, Robert. (Ed.) (1977). The Majjhima-Nikāya. Vol.III. London: PTS.
Davids, T. W. Rhys, & Carpenter, J. Estlin. (Eds.) (1966). The Dīgha Nikāya. Vol.II. London: PTS.
Davids, T. W. Rhys, & Stede, William. (Eds.) (1921). Pāli Text Society’s Pāli-English dictionary, Bristol, No.25, Vol.1.
Davids, T.W. Rhys, & Carpenter, J. Estlin. (Eds.) (1966). The Dīgha Nikāya. Vol. II. London: PTS.
Department of Religion Affairs, Ministry of Culture. (2017). Basic virtues, ethics, and religious teachings of 5 religions that promote good people and create a peaceful society. Bangkok: Department of Religion Affairs.
Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.377
Feer, M. L. (Ed.) (1976). Saṃyutta-Nikāya. Part V. Mahā-vagga. London: PTS.
Feer, M. L. (Ed.) (1989). Saṃyutta-Nikāya. Part II Nidāna-vagga. Oxford: PTS.
Feer, M. L. (Ed.) (1990). Saṃyutta-Nikāya. Part IV. Saḷāyatana-vagga. Oxford: PTS.
Furnell, M., Van Gordon, W., & Elander, J. (2025). A comparison of the effects of ethics- versus wisdom-based mindfulness practices on prosocial behaviour. Mindfulness, 16, 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02488-2
Hardy, E. (Ed.) (1976). The Aṅguttara-Nikāya. Part III. Pañcaka-nipāta, and Chakka-nipāta. London: PTS.
Hare, E. M. (Tran.) (1973). The book of the gradual sayings (Anguttara-Nikāya). Vol. III (The books
of the fives and sixes). London: PTS.
Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611419671
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
Mahatthanadull, Sanu., & Mahatthanadull, Sarita. (2018). The five precepts: Criteria and the promotion of individual and social peace. The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Universities (JIABU), 11(3), 180-193. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jiabu/article/view/219116
Mahatthanadull, Sanu., Piyabhani, Nantakorn Ven. Phramaha., Neminda, Ven., Tuan, Nguyen Anh Ven., Tshering, Ugyen Ven., Thanaboripat, Dusanee., & Mahatthanadull, Sarita. (2024). “A theory of Buddhism integration for sustainable development of wisdom and virtue in the 21st century”, Research Report. Funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund (TSRI). Buddhist Research Institute: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11348.21123
Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2009). Neurobiology of wisdom: A literature overview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(4), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.8
Morris, R. (Ed.) (1961). The Aṅguttara-Nikāya. Part I. Ekanipāta, Dukanipāta, and Tikanipāta. 2nd ed. London: PTS.
Ñānamoli, Bhikkhu., & Bodhi, Bhikkhu. (Trans.) (2001). The middle length discourses of the Buddha. Oxford: PTS.
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. (2009). Knowledge on desirable characteristics of Thai people: Quotients. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council.
Panattharo (Pho Si Ri), Pichet, Phra. (2022). Applying Buddhist principles to build mental strength against the Eight Worldly Conditions. Master’s Thesis in Buddhist Studies. Graduate School. Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.
Piyabhani, Nantakorn, Phramaha., & Mahatthanadull, Sanu. (2022). The development of systematic thinking based on a Buddhist approach in the 21st century. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 5105-5111. retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/10741
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/s08966273(02)00755-9
Sub-committee on University Transformation (Re-inventing University) and team, Manual for evaluating the determination of higher education institution groups (revised Ed.), Bangkok: Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. retrieved from https://qa.mcu.ac.th/index.php/book/reinventinguniv/
Tejapañño, Omsin, Phra. (2023). Contemporary applied Buddhism. Chonburi: Ashram Buddhaputra. Trenckner, V. (Ed.) (1979). The Majjhima-Nikāya. Vol.I. London: PTS.
Tripathi, S., Srisanga, T., Somjai, P., Ngohses, L., & Phuwayan, P. (2020). The development of moral indicator for promoting moral society. Research Work. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).
Walshe, Maurice. (Tran.) (1987). Thus have I heard: The long discourses of the Buddha (Dīgha Nikāya). London: Wisdom Publications.
Woodward, F. L. (Tran.) (1979). The book of the gradual sayings (Anguttara-Nikāya). Vol. I (Ones, twos, threes). London: PTS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thammasat Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and ideas expressed in all submissions published in Thammasat Review are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect that of the editors or the editorial board.
The copyright of all articles including all written content and illustrations belong to Thammasat Review. Any individuals or organisation wishing to publish, reproduce and distribute a particular manuscript must seek permission from the journal first.
