Mindful Consumption: Investigating the Role of Environmental Risk Perception and Green Advertising on Thai Consumers’ Green Purchasing Intentions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70730/tureview.v29i1.241631Keywords:
Environmental Risk Perception, Green Advertising, Green Attitude, Green Marketing, Stimulusorganism- response (S-O-R)Abstract
This study investigated the role of environmental perceptions and cognitions and green advertising on the purchase intentions of Thai consumers, using the stimulus-organism-response approach. Green risk perception (the perceived risk of environmental damage and climate change) and green advertising were positioned as stimuli, with environmental concern (awareness of and concern for environmental issues) and green attitude (willingness to act on environmental concern) as organism processes and purchase intention for green goods as response. Data was collected using an online survey of Thai consumers (n = 450) and analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares regression. Results showed significant positive effects of environmental risk perception and green advertising on environmental concern and green attitude. Environmental concern and green attitude had significant positive effect on purchase intention for green goods. The research addressed a gap in understanding of external stimuli like environmental risk perception and green advertising on consumer cognitions and behavior. The study’s findings suggest these external stimuli may be more important than previously thought in influencing purchase intentions, which has implications for both theory and for marketing practice.
References
Bailey, A. A., Mishra, A., & Tiamiyu, M. F. (2016). Green consumption values and Indian consumers’ response to marketing communications. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(7), 562-573. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-12-2015-1632
Bala, R., Singh, S., & Sharma, K. K. (2023). Relationship between environmental knowledge, environmental sensitivity, environmental attitude and environmental behavioural intention – a segmented mediation approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2021-0202
Blanco-Encomienda, F. J., & Rosillo-Díaz, E. (2025). Exploring brand attitude in e-commerce using the S-O-R model: the role of information quantity, information quality and source credibility. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 34(7), 1041-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2024-5095
Buxbaum, O. (2016). The S-O-R-Model. In Key Insights into Basic Mechanisms of Mental Activity (pp. 7-9). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-31929467-4_2
Carrión-Bósquez, N. G., Ortiz-Regalado, O., Veas-González, I., Naranjo-Armijo, F. G., & Guerra Regalado, W. F. (2024). The mediating role of attitude and environmental awareness in the influence of green advertising and eco-labels on green purchasing behaviors. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-08-2023-0217
Chang, H., Zhang, L., & Xie, G.-X. (2015). Message framing in green advertising: the effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 158-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2014.994731
Cruz, S. M., & Manata, B. (2020). Measurement of environmental concern: A review and analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363
De Canio, F., Martinelli, E., & Endrighi, E. (2021). Enhancing consumers’ pro-environmental purchase intentions: the moderating role of environmental concern. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(9), 1312-1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2020-0301
de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. da L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3
Eck, D. J. (2018). Bootstrapping for multivariate linear regression models. Statistics & Probability Letters, 134, 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2017.11.001
Fowler, A. R., & Close, A. G. (2012). It ain’t easy being green: Macro, meso, and micro green advertising agendas. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672461
Franzen, A., & Vogl, D. (2013). Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
Freedman, D. A. (1981). Bootstrapping regression models. The Annals of Statistics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345638
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192-3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Gahlot S., J., Sarkar, A., & Yadav, R. (2019). Brand it green: young consumers’ brand attitudes and purchase intentions toward green brand advertising appeals. Young Consumers, 20(3), 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2018-0840
Gao, S., Li, W., Ling, S., Dou, X., & Liu, X. (2019). An empirical study on the influence path of environmental risk perception on behavioral responses in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 2856. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162856
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Henry, A. D., & Dietz, T. (2012). Understanding environmental cognition. Organization & Environment, 25(3), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612456538
Janmaimool, P., & Chudech, S. (2020). Effect of domestic and global environmental events on environmental concern and environmental responsibility among university students. Sustainability, 12(4), 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041610
Jiang, J., Gao, B. W., & Su, X. (2022). Antecedents of tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior: The perspective of awe. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.619815
Kingston, A., & Paulraj, G. (2023). Purchasing practice of young consumers towards green packaging: influence of value system with the mediating effect of attitude. Sustainability, Agri, Food and Environmental Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.7770/safer-V12N1art2622
Kirmani, M. D., & Khan, M. N. (2018). Decoding willingness of Indian consumers to pay a premium on green products. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-11-2016-0091
Kong, Y., & Zhang, A. (2013). Consumer response to green advertising: The influence of product involvement. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(4), 428-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.774433
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Larson, R. B., & Kinsey, J. (2019). Culture and sampling issues with “Green” attitude research. Social Marketing Quarterly, 25(2), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500419838989
Li, X., Liu, Z., & Wuyun, T. (2022). Environmental value and pro-environmental behavior among young adults: The mediating role of risk perception and moral anger. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771421
Liao, Y.-K., Wu, W.-Y., & Pham, T.-T. (2020). Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers’ green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability, 12(18), 7461. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187461
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S10577408(07)70017-7
Maartensson, H., & Loi, N. M. (2022). Exploring the relationships between risk perception, behavioural willingness, and constructive hope in pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 28(4), 600-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.2015295
Maichum, K., Parichatnon, S., & Peng, K.-C. (2016). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability, 8(10), 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101077
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
Nahm, A. Y., Rao, S. S., Solis-Galvan, L. E., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2002). The Q-sort Method: Assessing reliability and construct validity of questionnaire items at a pre-testing stage. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 1(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1020255360
Nguyen-Viet, B. (2022). Understanding the influence of eco-label, and green advertising on green purchase intention: The mediating role of green brand equity. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 28(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2022.2043212
Oludoye, O. O., Supakata, N., Srithongouthai, S., Kanokkantapong, V., Van den Broucke, S., Ogunyebi, L., & Lubell, M. (2024). Pro-environmental behavior regarding single-use plastics reduction in urban–rural communities of Thailand: Implication for public policy. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 4713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55192-5
Ou, X. (2025, December 17). Sustainable consumption in Thailand. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/11080/sustainable-consumption-in-thailand/?srsltid=AfmBOorxU7uXkhDiU2IOwlsB9q6xp1nvAXAAr_5Vvh0hojw0jeImzXP7
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Ribeiro, M. A., Seyfi, S., Elhoushy, S., Woosnam, K. M., & Patwardhan, V. (2025). Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: The moderating role of green consumption values. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(6), 1079-1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2230389
Ruanguttamanun, C. (2023). How consumers in different cultural backgrounds prefer advertising in green ads through Hofstede’s cultural lens? A cross-cultural study. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22192
Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155
Shen, T., Rasdi, I. B., Ezani, N. E. B., & San, O. T. (2024). The mediating role of pro-environmental attitude and intention on the translation from climate change health risk perception to pro environmental behavior. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9831. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60418-7
Song, Y., & Luximon, Y. (2019). Design for Sustainability: The effect of lettering case on environmental concern from a green advertising perspective. Sustainability, 11(5), 1333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051333
Stephens, D. (2017). Essentials of consumer behavior. Routledge.
Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2015). A study on the impact of consumer risk perception and innovativeness on online shopping in India. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2013-0128
Thrane, C. (2020). Applied regression analysis: Doing, interpreting and reporting. New York: Routledge.
Udalov, V., & Welfens, P. J. J. (2021). Digital and competing information sources: Impact on environmental concern and prospects for international policy cooperation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 631-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-02100503-8
Usman, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Jahanger, A., & Ahmad, P. (2022). Pollution concern during globalization mode in financially resource-rich countries: Do financial development, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption matter? Renewable Energy, 183, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.067
Van Huy, L., Nguyen, H. T. T., Hoang Long, P., Quyen Phu Thi, P., & Tan Nhat, P. (2023). Going green: predicting tourists’ intentions to stay at eco-friendly hotels – the roles of green attitude and environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-05-2023-0355
Vieira, V. A. (2013). Stimuli–organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.009
Winton, B. G., & Sabol, M. A. (2022). A multi-group analysis of convenience samples: free, cheap, friendly, and fancy sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 861-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1961187
Xie, B., Brewer, M. B., Hayes, B. K., McDonald, R. I., & Newell, B. R. (2019). Predicting climate change risk perception and willingness to act. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101331
Zaiem, I., Sobaih, A. E. E., Gharbi, H., & Aliane, N. (2025). Think green, buy green? The role of green attitude and pro-environmental behaviour in the link between perceived policy effectiveness and green purchase intention. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2557974
Zeng, Z., Zhong, W., & Naz, S. (2023). Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 15(6), 4791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064791
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thammasat Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The opinions and ideas expressed in all submissions published in Thammasat Review are solely that of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect that of the editors or the editorial board.
The copyright of all articles including all written content and illustrations belong to Thammasat Review. Any individuals or organisation wishing to publish, reproduce and distribute a particular manuscript must seek permission from the journal first.




