European Peace Project: Federalist Perspective 

Main Article Content

Mykola Gnatiuk

Abstract

       The European peace project has become a popular topic for public discussions but not so much as a scholarly enterprise. Despite an initial spur at the beginning of integration, today little research exists on security causes and outcomes of integration. This study contributes to closing this gap in the literature by examining the European peace project from a federalist perspective. Relying on federalists’ works and security models this study examines ways proposed by federalists to more secure Europe and assesses the security function of the created integration communities that were set up in Europe after the Second World War. A number of important findings emerge from the analysis. First, security reasons paid the way to European unification, and European integration was intended to strengthen peace on the continent. Second, the federalist normative approach proposed the most radical security solution, which could serve as ideology, but could not be applied as an integration model in which primary units are nation-states. Third, from a federalist perspective European integration is not a primary security solution, nonetheless, it is capable to change relations between member-states and help overcome national resistance to uniting Europe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gnatiuk, M. (2022). European Peace Project: Federalist Perspective . National Interest, 2(8), 12–27. Retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIT/article/view/240288
Section
Academic articles

References

J. Mearsheimer, “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin”, Foreign Affairs, 2014, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 77-89.

E. Haas, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957. Stanford: Calif. Stanford University Press, 1958, 552 рp.

T. A. Börzel, Comparative Regionalism: European Integration and Beyond in Handbook on International Relations, Second Edition, London: Sage, 2013, p. 504.

D. Mitrany, “Prospect of Integration: Federal or Functional,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 1965, no. 4, pp. 119-149.

M. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, D. Verdier, “European Integration as a Solution to War,” European Journal of International Relations, 2005, no. 11(1), pp. 99-135.

K. Deutsch, Political community at the international level: problems of definition and measurement. N.Y.: Doubleday 1954, 70 рp.

S. Hoffmann, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,” Daedalus, 1966, no 95, pp. 862-915.

T. Risse, J. Caporaso, M. Green, “Europeanization and Domestic Change. Introduction,” Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change / edited by Maria Green Cowles, James Caporaso, and Thomas Risse. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2001. p. 1-20.

United Nations Charter, 1945. [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-1

V. Yakushik, “The Status of Cultural and Religious Communities in the Context of Post-Colonial Discourse in Ukraine,” Challenges of Postcolonialism: Philosophy, Religion, Education: materials of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference (Kyiv, May 16-17, 2019). Kyiv: Publishing House of NDPU, 2019, p. 47.

I. L. Claude, Swords into Plowshares: The Problems and Progress of International Organization. Random House, 1988, p. 408.

V. Yakushik, “In Search of Conceptual Platforms for East-West Cooperation, Global and Regional Integration Projects,” Philosophy and Cosmology, 2021, vol. 27, p. 178.

W. Lipgens, “European Federation in the Political Thought of Resistance Movements during World War II”, Central European History, 1968, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5-19.

W. Churchill, Universität Zürich, 19 September 1946. [Online]. Available: https://www.churchill-in-zurich.ch/site/assets/files/1807/rede_winston_churchill_englisch.pdf

P. Dubois, “De Recuperatione Terrae Sanctae. (Of the Restoration of the Holy Land)”, Searchlight on Peace Plans. Choose Your Road to World Government / Wynner E., Lloyd G. New York : EP Dutton and Company, Inc., 1949, p. 31.

G. Delanty, Inventing Europe: idea, identity, reality. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995, 187 pp.

Maximilian de Bethune. Duc de Sully, “The Great Design of Henry IV of France, as attributed to him by Sully in his Memoirs in Searchlight on Peace Plans,” Choose Your Road to World Government / Wynner E., Lloyd G. N.Y. : EP Dutton and Company, Inc., 1949, p. 34-35.

W. Penn William, An Essay towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe by the Establishment of a European Diet, Parliament or Estates. [Online]. Available: http://olldownload.libertyfund.org/Texts/LFBooks/Penn0200/PDFs/0479_Pt13_Peace.pdf.

Ch. De Saint-Pierre, A Project for Settling an Everlasting Peace in Europe First Proposed by Henry IV of France, and Approved of by Queen Elizabeth, and Now discussed at large, and made practicable by the Abbot St. Pierre. Michigan: Gale ECCO, 2010, 198 pp.

R. Coudenhove-Kalergi, An idea conquers the world. London: Hutchinson, 1953. 310 pp.

R. Coudenhove-Kalergi, Pan-Europe. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1926, 215 pp.

W. Lipgens, “European Federation in the Political Thought of Resistance Movements during World War II”, Central European History, 1968, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 6.

A. Spinelli, E. Rossi, The Ventotene Manifesto. Ventotene: The Altiero Spinelli Institute for Federalist Studies, 1941. [Online]. Available: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/the_manifesto_of_ventotene_1941-en-316aa96c-e7ff-4b9e-b43a-958e96afbecc.html

W. Lipgens, “European Federation in the Political Thought of Resistance Movements during World War II”, Central European History, 1968, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 13.

D. Deudney, “The Philadelphian System: Sovereignty, Arms Control and Balance of Power in the American States Union,” International Organization, 1995, no. 49 (2), pp. 191-228.

W. Lipgens, “European Federation in the Political Thought of Resistance Movements during World War II”, Central European History, 1968, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 11.

W. Churchill, The News of Peace (‘Iron Curtain Speech’). March 5, 1946. Westminster College, Fulton, Missouri. [Online]. Available: https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1946-1963-elder-statesman/the-sinews-of-peace/

W. Churchill, Universität Zürich, 19 September 1946. [Online]. Available: https://www.churchill-in-zurich.ch/site/assets/files/1807/rede_winston_churchill_englisch.pdf

J. Monnet, Mémoirs / translated by Richard Mayne. London: Collins, 1978, 544 pp.

W. Churchill, Universität Zürich, 19 September 1946. [Online]. Available: https://www.churchill-in-zurich.ch/site/assets/files/1807/rede_winston_churchill_englisch.pdf

A. Spinelli, The Eurocrats; conflict and crisis in the European Community. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1966, 229 pp.

M. Forsyth, “The Political Theory of Federalism: The Relevance of Classical Approaches in Federalizing Europe?”, The costs, benefits, and preconditions of federal political systems / Joachim Jens Hesse, Vincent Wright (ed.). – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 26.

A. Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London : Routledge, 1992, 477 pp.

M. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, D. Verdier, “European Integration as a Solution to War,” European Journal of International Relations, 2005, no. 11(1), p. 99.

M. Gnatiuk, “Integration and the European Security Solution: Overcoming the Security Dilemma,” Ukrainian Policymaker, 2022, vol. 10, p. 18. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.29202/up/10/3

M. Forsyth, “The political objectives of European integration”, International Affairs, 1967, no 43(3), p. 483.