Communicative aspects of the dialogue of cultures in the modern world

Main Article Content

Viktor Shcherbyna

Abstract

  The article examines the historical stages and logic of the formation of theoretical approaches to the problem of intercultural communication research. The author shows that in modern context intercultural communication is considered in two directions: as communication and interaction of cultures of different countries and peoples and as communication and interaction of subcultures. The author defines intercultural communication as a state of modern society, in which the complex structure of social and cultural space is embodied in symbolic forms and images that can be perceived and understood by the public and individual consciousness of various national communities and ethnic groups. The author believes that mutual assimilation of cultural elements contributes to integration processes, mutual cultural exchange and cultural enrichment, but there is also a process of strengthening national self-awareness. When, under the conditions of long-term communication with another culture, there is a loss of an essential part of the native culture, a phenomenon of uncertainty or instability arises, which gives rise to problems of intercultural communication. It was established that under such conditions, the dialogue of cultures is a complex, symbolic, personal, transactional and quite often unconscious process, which is necessarily imprecise, as it involves the level of mass virtual construction at the level of interpersonal interaction. The author introduces the classification of communication in the dialogue of cultures according to the nature of relations between subjects, distinguishing its social, business, and spiritual levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shcherbyna, V. . (2024). Communicative aspects of the dialogue of cultures in the modern world. National Interest, 4(15), 19–31. Retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIT/article/view/240822
Section
Academic articles

References

Apel, K.-O. (1997). Ethnoethik und universalistische Makroethik: Gegensatz oder Komplemen tarität? EineWelt – eine Moral? Eine kontroverse Debate. [Ethnoethics and universalistic macroethics: opposition or complementarity?One world – one morality? A controversial debate]. Hrsg.von W. Lütterfelds, Th. Mohrs. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges, (pp.60-76).(In German)

Buber, M. (1995). Dva tipa very [Two Types of Faith]. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian).

Cambridge International Dictionary of English. (1995). Cambridge Univ. Press, XVIII: 1-1792.

Communication.In Britannica.Retrieved January11,2024 https://www.britannica.com/topic/communication

Darmawati, Besse. (2022). Culture and interultural communication. https://typeset.io/papers/culture-and-interultural-communication-3kum5w16

Dreama, G. (2024). Moon Critical Reflections on Culture and Critical Intercultural Communication.

Thomas K. Nakayama, .&Rona Tamiko Halualani.(Eds.)(2012)The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI:10.1002/9781119745426

Habermas, J., &Luhmann, N. (1971). Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnolgie. Was leistet die Systemforschung? [Theory of society or social technology. What does it do? Systems research?] Frankfurt a.-M.: Suhrkamp. (In German)

Shynkaruk (holova), V. I.(2002) Filosofsʹkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk. [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary ]. NAN Ukrayiny, In-t filosofiyi imeni H. S. Skovorody ,Kyiv: Abrys, VI. (In Ukrainian).

Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.

Hall, Edward T. (1959). The_Silent_Language. Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, N.Y.

https://monoskop.org/images/5/57/Hall_Edward_T_The_Silent_Language.pdf

Hall, E. T. (1990). Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French and Americans. Intereultural Press.

Hills, Michael. (2002). D. Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's Values Orientation Theory. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=orpc

Hirsch, E. D. (1989). A first dictionary of cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.

Levchuk L. T., Panchenko V. I., Hrytsenko V. S., Yefimenko V. V., Losyev I. V., &Shynkarenko O. V. (1994). Istoriya svitovoyi kulʹtury: Navch. Posibnyk. [History of world culture: textbook]. Kyiv: Lybidʹ. (In Ukrainian).

Jaspers, K. (1958). Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen, politisches Bewusstsein in unserer Zeit.München, R. Piper.

Korinnyy, M. M., &Shevchenko, V. F.(Eds.) (2012). Korotkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk z kulʹtury. [Concise encyclopedic dictionary of culture] . Kyiv: Ukrayina.(In Ukrainian).

Lan Ni, Qi Wang Schlupp&Bey-Ling Sha. (2018). History and Foundational Theories of Intercultural Communication: Theories for Managing Relationships and Conflicts with Strategic Publics. Intercultural Public Relations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329687861_ History_and_Foundational_Theories_of_Intercultural_Communication_ Theories_for_Managing_Relationships_and_Conflicts_with_Strategic_Publics11.

Lao Tzu. Tao De Ching (s.a.) https://psylib.org.ua/books/_laotz01.htm

Mamedov, Mamed-zade (2019). Dialogkul'tur i vyzovy sovremennoy epokhi [Dialogue of cultures and challenges of the modern era.] Materials of the Baku forum dedicated to Pam. G. Aliyeva. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Russian).

M'yazova, I. U. (2008). Mizhkulʹturna komunikatsiya: zmist, sutnistʹ ta osoblyvosti proyavu: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. filos. nauk : spets. 09.00.03"Sotsialʹna filosofiya ta filosofiya istoriyi [Intercultural communication: content, essence and main manifestations: Dissertation abstract for obtaining the scientific degree of Candidate of Philosophical Sciences: specialization 09.00.03 Social philosophy and philosophy of history ]. Kyiv: KNU im. T. Shevchenka. (In Ukrainian).

Vasilika,. M. A.(Ed.)(2003) Osnovy teorii kommunikatsii: Uchebnik [ Fundamentals of Communication Theory: Textbook]Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russian).

Samovar, L., & Porter, F. (1994). Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Shabanova, U. O. (2019). Filosofiya kulʹtury : pidruchnyk. [Philosophy of culture: textbook]. Dnipro: Lira (In Ukrainian).

Singer, M. R. (1987). Intercultural Communication: A Perceptual Approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Slyushchynsʹkyy, B. V. (2005a). Mizhkulʹturna komunikatsiya yak metod sotsialʹnoho piznannya. [Intercultural communication as a method of social cognition]. Nova paradyhma, 45, 167-176. (In Ukrainian).

Slyushchynsʹkyy, B. V. (2005b). Sotsiolohiya mizhkulʹturnoyi komunikatsiyi yak spetsialʹna sotsiolohichna teoriya: perspektyvy ta mozhlyvosti statusnoho vyznachennya. Sociology of intercultural communication as a special sociological theory: prospects and possibilities of status determination]. Visnyk Kharkivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina,62–65. (In Ukrainian).

Steensland, B. (2018). Sociology of Culture. ttps://www.oxfordbibliographies. com/display/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0055.xml

Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2000). Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya . [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow: Slovo. (In Russian).

Triandis, H. (1991). Psychologia miedzykulturowa: rozwoj i dokonania . [Cross-cultural psychology: developments and achievements]. Przeglad Psychologiczny, 1. (In Polish).