Communicative aspects of the dialogue of cultures in the modern world
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the historical stages and logic of the formation of theoretical approaches to the problem of intercultural communication research. The author shows that in modern context intercultural communication is considered in two directions: as communication and interaction of cultures of different countries and peoples and as communication and interaction of subcultures. The author defines intercultural communication as a state of modern society, in which the complex structure of social and cultural space is embodied in symbolic forms and images that can be perceived and understood by the public and individual consciousness of various national communities and ethnic groups. The author believes that mutual assimilation of cultural elements contributes to integration processes, mutual cultural exchange and cultural enrichment, but there is also a process of strengthening national self-awareness. When, under the conditions of long-term communication with another culture, there is a loss of an essential part of the native culture, a phenomenon of uncertainty or instability arises, which gives rise to problems of intercultural communication. It was established that under such conditions, the dialogue of cultures is a complex, symbolic, personal, transactional and quite often unconscious process, which is necessarily imprecise, as it involves the level of mass virtual construction at the level of interpersonal interaction. The author introduces the classification of communication in the dialogue of cultures according to the nature of relations between subjects, distinguishing its social, business, and spiritual levels.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
National Interest Academic Journal under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License The journal allows access or distribution of academic work without charge or registration. To support the exchange of knowledge Scope covers academic work in geopolitics. Geoeconomics and Innovation
Users can share, copy and distribute all information published in National Interest Academic Journal in any form or medium subject to the following conditions:
Citation — Permission to use, reproduce, distribute, or modify the work. But credit must be given to the owner of the work. If the work is used without credit, the name of the owner of the work will be Must obtain permission from the owner of the work first.
Noncommercial — The work may be used, reproduced, distributed, or modified. However, the work or article may not be used for commercial purposes.
Cannot be modified — The work may be used, reproduced, and distributed. But do not modify the work. unless permission is received from the owner of the work first
References
Apel, K.-O. (1997). Ethnoethik und universalistische Makroethik: Gegensatz oder Komplemen tarität? EineWelt – eine Moral? Eine kontroverse Debate. [Ethnoethics and universalistic macroethics: opposition or complementarity?One world – one morality? A controversial debate]. Hrsg.von W. Lütterfelds, Th. Mohrs. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges, (pp.60-76).(In German)
Buber, M. (1995). Dva tipa very [Two Types of Faith]. Moscow: Respublika. (In Russian).
Cambridge International Dictionary of English. (1995). Cambridge Univ. Press, XVIII: 1-1792.
Communication.In Britannica.Retrieved January11,2024 https://www.britannica.com/topic/communication
Darmawati, Besse. (2022). Culture and interultural communication. https://typeset.io/papers/culture-and-interultural-communication-3kum5w16
Dreama, G. (2024). Moon Critical Reflections on Culture and Critical Intercultural Communication.
Thomas K. Nakayama, .&Rona Tamiko Halualani.(Eds.)(2012)The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI:10.1002/9781119745426
Habermas, J., &Luhmann, N. (1971). Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnolgie. Was leistet die Systemforschung? [Theory of society or social technology. What does it do? Systems research?] Frankfurt a.-M.: Suhrkamp. (In German)
Shynkaruk (holova), V. I.(2002) Filosofsʹkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk. [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary ]. NAN Ukrayiny, In-t filosofiyi imeni H. S. Skovorody ,Kyiv: Abrys, VI. (In Ukrainian).
Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
Hall, Edward T. (1959). The_Silent_Language. Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, N.Y.
https://monoskop.org/images/5/57/Hall_Edward_T_The_Silent_Language.pdf
Hall, E. T. (1990). Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French and Americans. Intereultural Press.
Hills, Michael. (2002). D. Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's Values Orientation Theory. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=orpc
Hirsch, E. D. (1989). A first dictionary of cultural literacy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE Publications.
Levchuk L. T., Panchenko V. I., Hrytsenko V. S., Yefimenko V. V., Losyev I. V., &Shynkarenko O. V. (1994). Istoriya svitovoyi kulʹtury: Navch. Posibnyk. [History of world culture: textbook]. Kyiv: Lybidʹ. (In Ukrainian).
Jaspers, K. (1958). Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen, politisches Bewusstsein in unserer Zeit.München, R. Piper.
Korinnyy, M. M., &Shevchenko, V. F.(Eds.) (2012). Korotkyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk z kulʹtury. [Concise encyclopedic dictionary of culture] . Kyiv: Ukrayina.(In Ukrainian).
Lan Ni, Qi Wang Schlupp&Bey-Ling Sha. (2018). History and Foundational Theories of Intercultural Communication: Theories for Managing Relationships and Conflicts with Strategic Publics. Intercultural Public Relations. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329687861_ History_and_Foundational_Theories_of_Intercultural_Communication_ Theories_for_Managing_Relationships_and_Conflicts_with_Strategic_Publics11.
Lao Tzu. Tao De Ching (s.a.) https://psylib.org.ua/books/_laotz01.htm
Mamedov, Mamed-zade (2019). Dialogkul'tur i vyzovy sovremennoy epokhi [Dialogue of cultures and challenges of the modern era.] Materials of the Baku forum dedicated to Pam. G. Aliyeva. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Russian).
M'yazova, I. U. (2008). Mizhkulʹturna komunikatsiya: zmist, sutnistʹ ta osoblyvosti proyavu: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. filos. nauk : spets. 09.00.03"Sotsialʹna filosofiya ta filosofiya istoriyi [Intercultural communication: content, essence and main manifestations: Dissertation abstract for obtaining the scientific degree of Candidate of Philosophical Sciences: specialization 09.00.03 Social philosophy and philosophy of history ]. Kyiv: KNU im. T. Shevchenka. (In Ukrainian).
Vasilika,. M. A.(Ed.)(2003) Osnovy teorii kommunikatsii: Uchebnik [ Fundamentals of Communication Theory: Textbook]Moscow: Gardariki. (In Russian).
Samovar, L., & Porter, F. (1994). Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Shabanova, U. O. (2019). Filosofiya kulʹtury : pidruchnyk. [Philosophy of culture: textbook]. Dnipro: Lira (In Ukrainian).
Singer, M. R. (1987). Intercultural Communication: A Perceptual Approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Slyushchynsʹkyy, B. V. (2005a). Mizhkulʹturna komunikatsiya yak metod sotsialʹnoho piznannya. [Intercultural communication as a method of social cognition]. Nova paradyhma, 45, 167-176. (In Ukrainian).
Slyushchynsʹkyy, B. V. (2005b). Sotsiolohiya mizhkulʹturnoyi komunikatsiyi yak spetsialʹna sotsiolohichna teoriya: perspektyvy ta mozhlyvosti statusnoho vyznachennya. Sociology of intercultural communication as a special sociological theory: prospects and possibilities of status determination]. Visnyk Kharkivsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina,62–65. (In Ukrainian).
Steensland, B. (2018). Sociology of Culture. ttps://www.oxfordbibliographies. com/display/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0055.xml
Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2000). Yazyk i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya . [Language and intercultural communication]. Moscow: Slovo. (In Russian).
Triandis, H. (1991). Psychologia miedzykulturowa: rozwoj i dokonania . [Cross-cultural psychology: developments and achievements]. Przeglad Psychologiczny, 1. (In Polish).