Beyond Myths: Unpacking Thailand’s Soft Balancing in Foreign Policy toward China

Main Article Content

Rakwong Prakrit

Abstract

         Amid intensifying great power rivalry between the United States and China, how does Thailand navigate its foreign policy direction? Since the coup in 2014, Thailand has often been portrayed as bandwagoning with China. Through documentary analysis, empirical data, and case study methods, this article challenges that myth by arguing that elements of balancing exist, albeit in a soft form. This “soft balancing” is driven by Thailand’s prerequisite conditions to restrain China’s power through institutions without resorting to hard military measures. The strategy spans three dimensions: security, economy, and diplomacy. Evidence suggests that Thailand employs soft balancing by capitalizing on its alliance with the United States, imposing conditions on infrastructure investments as well as diversifying partnerships, and leveraging ASEAN institutional mechanisms. By unpacking Thailand’s soft balancing in practice, this article contributes to debates on secondary state alignments, particularly regarding how secondary states respond to great power competition and China’s growing influence, and offers policy lessons for other smaller states on deftly maneuvering toward greater powers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prakrit, R. (2025). Beyond Myths: Unpacking Thailand’s Soft Balancing in Foreign Policy toward China. National interest Thailand, 6(2), 69–81. retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIT/article/view/241669
Section
Academic articles

References

Aroonpipat, S. (2024). Is Thailand a Competitive Battlefield for High-speed Rail between China

andJapan?. Journal of Mekong Societies, 20(3), 92–127.

https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/271811

ASEAN. (2019, June 22). ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific.

https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ASEAN-Outlook-on-the-Indo-

Pacific_FINAL_22062019.pdf

Bangkokbiznews. (2017, June 24). Five conditions for the Thai–China high-speed rail.

https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/761186

Bangkok Post. (2023, April 4). China decries Philippine-US base deal. Bangkok Post.

https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/2543049/china-decries-philippine-us-base-deal?

Bernhardt, J. (2021). Joint Military Exercises Dataset [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse.

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HXQFHU

Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Harvard

University Press.

Buszynski, L. (2003). ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea. Contemporary

Southeast Asia, 25(3), 343–362. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798652

Chandran, R. (2023, March 23). China's Mekong dams turn Thai fishing villages into 'ghost towns'.

The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/03/23/asia-pacific/china-

river-dam-thai-ghost-village/

Chongkittavorn, K. (2018, February 6). Cobra Gold 2018: No more cheap talk, just action.

Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1408206/cobra-gold-

-no-more-cheap-talk-just-action

Goh, E. (2016, February 22). Southeast Asian Strategies toward the Great Powers: Still Hedging

After All These Years? The Asan Forum. https://theasanforum.org/southeast-asian-strategies-

toward-the-great-powers-still-hedging-after-all-these-years/

Han, E. (2018). Under the Shadow of China-US Competition: Myanmar and Thailand’s Alignment

Choices. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(1), 81-104.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox017

He, K. (2006). Does ASEAN Matter? International Relations Theories, Institutional Realism, and

ASEAN. Asian Security, 2(3), 189-214.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14799850600920460

He, K. (2008). Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic interdependence

and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations,

(3), 489-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108092310

He, K., & Feng, H. (2008). If Not Soft Balancing, Then What? Reconsidering Soft Balancing and US

Policy toward China. Security Studies, 17(2),

https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098776

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and Interdependence (4th ed.). Pearson.

Kissinger, H. A. (1966). Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy. Daedalus, 95(2), 503–529.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20026982

Lebow, R. N. (1994). The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism.

International Organization, 48(2), 249–277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706932

McDougall, D. (2012). Responses to ‘Rising China’ in the East Asian Region: soft balancing with

accommodation, Journal of Contemporary China, 21(73), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2012.627662

Pape, R. A. (2005). Soft Balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7–45.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137457

Paul, T. V. (2018, May 15). ASEAN and soft balancing: South China Sea as zone of peace? RSIS

Commentary No. 82. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/CO18082.pdf

Paul, T. V. (2018). Restraining great powers: Soft balancing from empires to the global era. Yale

University Press.

Pongsudhirak, T. (2016). An Unaligned Alliance: Thailand-U.S. Relations in the Early 21st Century.

Asian Politics & Policy, 8(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12233

Sato, J., & Yaacob, A. R. (2023, December 2). Is China replacing the US as Thailand’s main security

partner? The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2023/12/is-china-replacing-the-us-as-

thailands-main-security-partner/

Seah, S., et al. (2024). The State of Southeast Asia: 2024 Survey Report. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak

Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/The-State-of-SEA-

pdf

Shambaugh, D. (2018). U.S.-China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive

Coexistence? International Security, 42(4), 85–127.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26777839

Silver, L., Huang, C., Clancy, L., & Prozorovsky, A. (2024, July 9). Views of China and Xi Jinping

in 35 countries. Pew Research Center.

https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/07/09/views-of-china-and-xi-jinping/

SIPRI. (2025, March 10). SIPRI Arms Transfers Database [Data set].

https://doi.org/10.55163/SAFC1241

Terazawa, T. (2023, October 13). How Japan solved its rare earth minerals dependency issue. World

Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/10/japan-rare-earth-minerals/

Thrall, A. T., Cohen, J., & Dorminey, C. (2020). Power, Profit, or Prudence? US Arms Sales since

/11. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(2), 100–126.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915279

U.S. Department of Defense. (2023, April 3). Philippines, U.S. announce locations of four new

EDCA sites.https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/article/3349257/philippines-

us-announce-locations-of-four-new-edca-sites/

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Thailand. (2017, October 2) Joint Statement between the United

States of America and the Kingdom of Thailand. https://th.usembassy.gov/joint-statement-

united-states-america-kingdom-thailand/

U.S. Embassy & Consulate in Thailand. (2025, February 18). Exercise Cobra Gold 2025 to begin

February 25, 2025. https://th.usembassy.gov/exercise-cobra-gold-2025-to-begin-

february-25-2025/

Walt, S. M. (2005) Taming American Power: The global response to U.S. primacy. W. W. Norton &

Company.

Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772

Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, 24(1), 5–41.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539346

World Bank. (n.d.). Thailand country snapshot. World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS).

https://wits.worldbank.org/CountrySnapshot/en/THA

Zirulnick, A. (2012, May 15). Philippines feels the economic cost of standing up to China. The

Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/terrorism-

security/2012/0515/Philippines-feels-the-economic-cost-of-standing-up-to-China