Digital Tools in Security Governance: Enhancing Public Participation and Deliberative Democracy - the case of Poland

Main Article Content

Katerina Veljanovska Blazhevska
Ryszard Szpyra

Abstract

       Poland's rapid digital transformation reshapes democratic engagement in national security governance, offering opportunities and challenges. Despite expanding e-governance, digital identification, and consultation tools, barriers like unequal digital literacy and limited transparency hinder inclusive participation. This study, grounded in Habermas’ deliberative democracy theory, explores how digital tools can enhance accountability and public involvement in security decision-making. Using a mixed-method approach—expert interviews, student surveys at War Studies University in Warsaw, and analysis of policy documents and media—it reveals limited civic engagement despite widespread use of digital platforms for information access. Institutional trust, influenced by transparency, leadership, and media framing, remains moderate. Experts highlight the potential and limitations of digital deliberative mechanisms for democratic legitimacy. The study recommends developing secure, transparent digital platforms to improve public consultations in security policy-making. While Poland’s technological infrastructure supports digital inclusion, uneven participation underscores the need to strengthen capacities for genuine democratic co-creation in security governance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Veljanovska Blazhevska, K., & Szpyra, R. (2025). Digital Tools in Security Governance: Enhancing Public Participation and Deliberative Democracy - the case of Poland. National Interest, 6(1), 35–54. retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIT/article/view/241651
Section
Research articles

References

Algolytics. (2025). Digitalisation of Poland 2035 – A strategy to shape the future.

https://algolytics.com/digitalisation-of-poland-2035-a-strategy-to-shape-the-future/

Barandiaran, X. E., Calleja-López, A., Monterde, A., & Romero, C. (2024). Decidim, a

technopolitical network for participatory democracy: Philosophy, practice and autonomy of a

collective platform in the age of digital intelligence. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50784-7

Bird & Bird. (2025). Poland sets out digital priorities for the next six months: Bird & Bird insight,

including Digital Networks Act and EU Council Presidency agenda.

https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2025/poland-sets-out-digital-priorities-for-the-

next-six-months

CERT Polska. (2024). About CERT Polska. NASK. https://cert.pl/en/

Davies, T., & Chandler, R. (2013). Online deliberation design: Choices, criteria, and evidence.

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.5177

Decent Cybersecurity. (2025). Poland unveils landmark Digital Strategy 2035: A comprehensive

roadmap for digital transformation. https://decentcybersecurity.eu/poland-unveils-landmark-

digital-strategy-2035-a-comprehensive-roadmap-for-digital-transformation/

European Commission. (2019). National Integrated Informatization Programme 2020 (PZIP)

[European Commission report].

European Commission. (2025). Digital Decade Country Report. https://digital-

strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade-2025-country-reports

Gov.pl. (2023a). ePUAP and Trusted Profile (Profil Zaufany). https://www.gov.pl/web/profilzaufany

Government of Poland. (2019). Cybersecurity strategy of the Republic of Poland for 2019–2024.

Ministry of Digital Affairs. https://www.gov.pl/web/cyfryzacja/strategia-cyberbezpieczenstwa

Hasler, S., Chenal, J., & Soutter, M. (2017). Digital tools and citizen participation: Towards

sustainable and responsive urban planning. https://doi.org/10.5176/2425-

_UPPD17.18

McCarthy, S., Rowan, W., Mahony, C., & Vergne, A. (2023). The dark side of digitalization and

social media platform governance: A citizen engagement study. Internet Research, 33(6),

–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0142

National Centre for Research and Development. (2022). National Cybersecurity Platform.

https://www.ncbr.gov.pl

OECD. (2015). Open government data review of Poland: Unlocking the value of government data.

OECD Digital Government Studies. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231442-en

Polsci Institute. (2024). Deliberative democracy: The role of reasoned discussion in politics.

https://polsci.institute

Publyon. (2025). EU digital policy update, No. 25. https://publyon.com/eu-digital-policy-update-

no-25/

Soper, T. (2014). Startup spotlight: Pol.is uses machine learning, data visualization to help large

groups spur conversation. GeekWire. https://www.geekwire.com

The Guardian. (2025, January 26). Convenient or intrusive? How Poland has embraced digital ID

cards. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/26/poland-digital-id-cards-e

-government-app

Warsaw Business Journal. (2025). Government presents draft of Polish digitization strategy, including

AI.https://wbj.pl/government-presents-draft-of-polish-digitization-strategy-including-

ai/post/143895