Digital tools in security governance: enhancing public participation and deliberative democracy - the case of Poland
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Poland's rapid digital transformation reshapes democratic engagement in national security governance, offering opportunities and challenges. Despite expanding e-governance, digital identification, and consultation tools, barriers like unequal digital literacy and limited transparency hinder inclusive participation. This study, grounded in Habermas’ deliberative democracy theory, explores how digital tools can enhance accountability and public involvement in security decision-making. Using a mixed-method approach—expert interviews, student surveys at War Studies University in Warsaw, and analysis of policy documents and media—it reveals limited civic engagement despite widespread use of digital platforms for information access. Institutional trust, influenced by transparency, leadership, and media framing, remains moderate. Experts highlight the potential and limitations of digital deliberative mechanisms for democratic legitimacy. The study recommends developing secure, transparent digital platforms to improve public consultations in security policy-making. While Poland’s technological infrastructure supports digital inclusion, uneven participation underscores the need to strengthen capacities for genuine democratic co-creation in security governance.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Thai Journal of National Interest Academic Journal under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License The journal allows access or distribution of academic work without charge or registration. To support the exchange of knowledge Scope covers academic work in geopolitics. Geoeconomics and Innovation
Users can share, copy and distribute all information published in National Interest Academic Journal in any form or medium subject to the following conditions:
Citation — Permission to use, reproduce, distribute, or modify the work. But credit must be given to the owner of the work. If the work is used without credit, the name of the owner of the work will be Must obtain permission from the owner of the work first.
Noncommercial — The work may be used, reproduced, distributed, or modified. However, the work or article may not be used for commercial purposes.
Cannot be modified — The work may be used, reproduced, and distributed. But do not modify the work. unless permission is received from the owner of the work first
References
Algolytics. (2025). Digitalisation of Poland 2035 – A strategy to shape the future. https://algolytics.com/digitalisation-of-poland-2035-a-strategy-to-shape-the-future/
Barandiaran, X. E., Calleja-López, A., Monterde, A., & Romero, C. (2024). Decidim, a technopolitical network for participatory democracy: Philosophy, practice and autonomy of a collective platform in the age of digital intelligence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
-031-50784-7
Bird & Bird. (2025). Poland sets out digital priorities for the next six months: Digital Networks Act and EU Council Presidency agenda [Industry insight]. https://www.twobirds.com/en/insights/2025/poland-sets-out-digital-priorities-for-the-next-six-months
CERT Polska. (2024). About CERT Polska. NASK. https://cert.pl/en/
Davies, T., & Chandler, R. (2013). Online deliberation design: Choices, criteria, and evidence. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.5177
Decent Cybersecurity. (2025). Poland unveils landmark Digital Strategy 2035: A comprehensive roadmap for digital transformation [Industry report]. https://decentcybersecurity.eu/poland-unveils-landmark-digital-strategy-2035-a-comprehensive-roadmap-for-digital-transformation/
European Commission. (2019). National Integrated Informatization Programme 2020 (PZIP) [Report].
European Commission. (2025). Digital Decade Country Report. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/digital-decade-2025-country-reports
Gov.pl. (2023). ePUAP and Trusted Profile (Profil Zaufany). https://www.gov.pl/web/profilzaufany
Government of Poland. (2019). Cybersecurity strategy of the Republic of Poland for 2019–2024. Ministry of Digital Affairs.
https://www.gov.pl/web/cyfryzacja/strategia-cyberbezpieczenstwa
McCarthy, S., Rowan, W., Mahony, C., & Vergne, A. (2023). The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: A citizen engagement study. Internet Research, 33(6), 2172–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2022-0142
National Centre for Research and Development. (2022). National Cybersecurity Platform. https://www.ncbr.gov.pl
OECD. (2015). Open government data review of Poland: Unlocking the value of government data.
OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264231442-en
Polsci Institute. (2024). Deliberative democracy: The role of reasoned discussion in politics [Educational resource].https://polsci.institute
Publyon. (2025). EU digital policy update (No. 25) [Policy brief]. https://publyon.com/eu-digital-policy-update-no-25/
Soper, T. (2014). Startup spotlight: Pol.is uses machine learning, data visualization to help large groups spur conversation. GeekWire.https://www.geekwire.com
The Guardian. (2025, January 26). Convenient or intrusive? How Poland has embraced digital ID cards.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/26/poland-digital-id-cards-e-government-app
Warsaw Business Journal. (2025). Government presents draft of Polish digitization strategy, including AI [News article].https://wbj.pl/government-presents-draft-of-polish-digitization-strategy-including-ai/post/143895
