Factors determining the states' level of strategic activity

Main Article Content

Sanjay Pooran

Abstract

      This article is focused on the behaviours of states and what are the driving influences behind their actions. Analysing the concept of a power idea dichotomy in shaping a global agenda that forces strategic behaviours to rise above constructivism, liberalism, and realism models of international relations. It uses China as the perfect backdrop from which to shape this argument around a new global order that is fast evolving with the ever present threat of cold-war resurrection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pooran, S. (2023). Factors determining the states’ level of strategic activity. National Interest, 2(10), 37–45. Retrieved from https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NIT/article/view/240389
Section
Academic articles

References

Horton, Chris. (2019). China’s playbook in Hong Kong is also working in the Asia Pacific.

The Atlantic. August 26, 2019.

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/08/china-uses-its-regional-playbook-hong-kong/596797/

Ivison, Duncan (2002). Postcolonial liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lantis, Jeffrey S. (2014). Strategic cultures and security policies in the Asia-Pacific. Contemporary

Security Policy, 35 (2), 166-186. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13523260.2014.927676

Li, Rex. (2008). A rising China and security in East Asia: Identity construction and security discourse.

London: Routledge.

Mearsheimer, John J. (2007). Structural realism. International relations theories: Discipline and

diversity. 83. https://www.commackschools.org/Downloads/8_mearsheimer-_ structural_realism.pdf

Nabarun, Roy. (2013). Review: Chinese and Indian strategic behavior: growing power and alarm by

George J. Gilboy, Eric Heginbotham. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 89 (2), 546-548. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23473579.pdf

Noguchi, Kazuhiko. (2011). Bringing Realism Back In: Explaining China's Strategic Behavior in the

Asia-Pacific. Asia-Pacific Review, 18 (2), 60-85.

Shiping, Tang. (2015). From Offensive Realism to Defensive Realism: A Social Evolutionary

Interpretation of China’s Security Strategy. China’s Ascent. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801456992-009

Sloan, Eleanor. (2010). China’s Strategic Behaviour. Canadian Devence & Foreign Affairs Institute.

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cdfai/pages/41/attachments/original/1413662050/China_Strategic_Behaviour.pdf

Snyder, Glenn H. (2002). Mearsheimer’s World – Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A

Review Essay. International Security, 27 (1), 149-173.

Toft, Peter. (2005). John J. Mearsheimer: an offensive realist between geopolitics and power. Journal

of International Relations and Development, 8 (4), 381-408.