Building strong institutional capacities for stable states – national interest versus reforming process: positive practices and recommendations Building strong institutional capacities for stable states – national interest versus reforming process: positive practices and recommendations
Main Article Content
Abstract
National goals and interests are a priority for every state, both for the population and for the state elites. However, in certain societies there are internal fractions, different social groups or ethnic communities, which may aspire to different high goals. It should be properly followed and respected, both by the state authorities and by the foreign actors.
When promoting missions to encourage a reform process for the need to build the capacities of strong institutions as a condition for stable states, they need to be based on respect for national goals and interests, overall, but also to strive for affection of the public and proclaimed public opinion.
Within this paper, an analytical approach is promoted in the creation of an original theoretical framework for presenting a complete process of guarding capacities for strong institutions and stable states. Through the application of a qualitative categorical framework, through the analysis of existing facts, their comparison, specification and synthesis, conclusions and recommendations for action in specific social situations are drawn.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
National Interest Academic Journal under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License The journal allows access or distribution of academic work without charge or registration. To support the exchange of knowledge Scope covers academic work in geopolitics. Geoeconomics and Innovation
Users can share, copy and distribute all information published in National Interest Academic Journal in any form or medium subject to the following conditions:
Citation — Permission to use, reproduce, distribute, or modify the work. But credit must be given to the owner of the work. If the work is used without credit, the name of the owner of the work will be Must obtain permission from the owner of the work first.
Noncommercial — The work may be used, reproduced, distributed, or modified. However, the work or article may not be used for commercial purposes.
Cannot be modified — The work may be used, reproduced, and distributed. But do not modify the work. unless permission is received from the owner of the work first
References
L. Pritchett, L., M. Woolcock, Solutions when the Solution is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development, World Development, vol. 32, no. 2, 2004, pp. 191-212.
P. Finkenbusch, Liberal peace: from civilising mission to self-doubt, Global Change, Peace & Security, vol. 33, no 2, 2021, pp. 163-176.
L. M. Howard, UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 12-13.
A. Radin, Institution Building in Weak States: The Primacy of Local Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2020.
G. Toal, C. T. Dahlman, Bosnia Remade: Ethnic Cleansing and its Reversal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
A. Suhrke, Peacekeepers a Nation-Builders: Dilemmas of the UN in East Timor, International Peacekeeping, vol. 8, no. 4, 2001, pp. 1-20.
M. Andrews, L. Pritchett, M. Woolcock, Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
R. Paris, T.D. Sisk, The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations. London: Routledge, 2009.
K. Chandra, What is an Ethnic Party? Party Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 151-69.
S. A. Peaceland, Conflic Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 70-93.
L. P. Bremer, My Year in Iraq: The Struggle to Build a Future of Hope. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2006
C. Manning, “Party-Building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique,” Democratization 14, no. 2, 2007.
J. Dobbins, S. G. Jones, K. Crane, B. C. DeGrasse, The Beginne’s Guide to Nation-Building. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2007.
E. Wood, “The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11, no. 1, 2008, pp. 539-61.
L. Balcells, “The Consequences of Victimization on Political Identities: Evidence from Spain,” Politics and Society, vol. 40, no. 3, 2012, pp. 311-47.
R. D. Petersen, Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
P. Staniland, Networks of Rebellion: Explaining Insurgent Cohesion and Collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.
E. Noelle-Neumann, The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
M. Weber, H. Gerth, C. W. Mills, Selections from Weber’s longer works: Sociology of religion, Economy and society, and Collected political essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.
E. Pierre, D. M. Tull. “Postconflict Reconstruction in Africa: Flawed Ideas about Failed States,” International Security, vol. 32, no. 4, 2008, pp. 106–39.
M. R. Gerald, B. Michael, New Techniques of Persuasion. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
McG. J. William, “Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. I, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press, 1964.
A. Radin, Institution Building in Weak States: The Primacy of Local Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2020.