3D Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Shaped Charge Liner Thickness on Penetration into a Steel Target

Main Article Content

Tassanee Tubchareon
Thanach Khantong
Weerachart Kulsirikasem

Abstract

The explosion of a high-explosive charge in a shaped charge warhead rapidly converts the explosive material into gaseous products with extremely high pressure through a chemical reaction. This high pressure can damage the shaped charge warhead's structure, causing natural fragmentation of the casing and collapse of the liner, which leads to the formation of a jet. Generally, experimental testing of shaped charge detonation processes is more expensive and dangerous than computer simulations. This work presents three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations of shaped charges based on the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method. The effect of liner thickness on jet formation and penetration depth into a steel target was investigated. The charge had a diameter of 36 mm (CD), and the stand-off distance was set to 3CD. The copper liners had uniform wall thicknesses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.3 mm, based on the explosive-to-copper weight ratio, with a cone angle of 45°. The results showed that pressure increased after detonation and reached the liner within 4 microseconds. The maximum jet velocities observed were 10,780, 9,070, and 6,520 m/s for liner thicknesses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.3 mm, respectively. Increasing the liner's thickness resulted in a decrease in the maximum jet tip velocity and jet length. Additionally, the slug size increased with liner thickness. Regarding the penetration performance of the shaped charge, all liner thicknesses successfully penetrated a 10 mm thick steel target. The effect of increasing the target thickness was also investigated. The liner thicknesses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.3 mm were able to penetrate steel targets up to 7 mm, 10 mm, and 50 mm, respectively. The results demonstrated that the ability to penetrate the target increased with liner thickness due to the increased momentum balance and kinetic energy. However, as liner thickness increased, the borehole size decreased.

Downloads

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
T. Tubchareon, T. Khantong, and W. Kulsirikasem, “3D Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Shaped Charge Liner Thickness on Penetration into a Steel Target”, Def. Technol. Acad. J., vol. 6, no. 14, pp. R61–70, Feb. 2025.
Section
Research Articles

References

Y. Du, G. He, Y. Liu, Z. Guo, and Z. Qiao, “Study on Penetration Performance of Rear Shaped Charge Warhead,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 21, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma14216526.

P. Żochowski and R. Warchoł, “Experimental and numerical study on the influence of shaped charge liner cavity filing on jet penetration characteristics in steel targets,” Defence Technology, vol. 23, pp. 60–74, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.09.007.

L.-Y. Xu, Y. Tian, X.-B. Liu, and S.-P. Wang, “Numerical investigation on jet penetration capacity of hypervelocity shaped charge in underwater explosion,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 281, p. 114668, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114668.

T. Elshenawy, “Criteria of design improvement of shaped charges used as oil well perforators,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:135504208

H. Shekhar, “Theoretical Modelling of Shaped Charges in the Last Two Decades (1990-2010): A Review,” Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, vol. 9, Jan. 2012.

C. Poole, “Penetration of a shaped charge,” PhD Thesis, 2005.

A. Catovic, “Research of influence of different shaped charge liner materials on penetration depth using numerical simulations,” Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), vol. 11, pp. 1–26, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.21533/pen.v11i4.3500.g1307.

Z. Zhang, L. Wang, and V. V. Silberschmidt, “Damage response of steel plate to underwater explosion: Effect of shaped charge liner,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 103, pp. 38–49, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.008.

J. Yi, Z. Wang, J. Yin, and Z. Zhang, “Simulation Study on Expansive Jet Formation Characteristics of Polymer Liner,” Materials, vol. 12, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ma12050744.

Z. Zhang, L. Wang, V. V. Silberschmidt, and S. Wang, “SPH-FEM simulation of shaped-charge jet penetration into double hull: A comparison study for steel and SPS,” Composite Structures, vol. 155, pp. 135–144, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.002.

Y. Gu, J. Wang, H. Li, K. Tang, and L. Liu, “Formation characteristics and penetration performance of an underwater shaped charge jet,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 258, p. 111695, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111695.

T. Elshenawy, E. Ezzat, A. M. Riad, and M. A. Elkader, “Influence of Liner Wall Thickness on the Penetration Performance of PETN-HTPB PBX-based Shaped Charges into Steel Targets,” Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–90, 2022.

Y. Han et al., “Study on the Penetration Performance of Micro-shaped Charge with Different Liner Materials,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1855, no. 1, p. 012013, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1855/1/012013.

D. L. Feng, M. B. Liu, H. Q. Li, and G. R. Liu, “Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of linear shaped charge with jet formation and penetration effects,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 86, pp. 77–85, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.06.033.

B. Hong, W. Li, Y. Li, Z. Guo, and B. Yan, “Jet formation and penetration performance of a double-layer charge liner with chemically-deposited tungsten as the inner liner,” Defence Technology, vol. 33, pp. 374–385, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2023.08.016.